Comments on: Andrew vs Amanda, part II http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/ NewTeeVee Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:42:24 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Windstorm Recovery Roundup http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-263320 Windstorm Recovery Roundup Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:49:17 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-263320 <p>[...] Amanda Gate Part II: Why can’t these people STFU? If you don’t know what that means, look it up. [...]</p> [...] Amanda Gate Part II: Why can’t these people STFU? If you don’t know what that means, look it up. [...]

]]> By: Bradley Delerum http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-7909 Bradley Delerum Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:22:27 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-7909 <p>At the beginning of today I had no idea who either of these people were, but it's been super-slow at work so I spent the time googling their little mudfight and you know what? This ANdrew is clearly the victim of the deadly sins of GREED & PRIDE, he realized his naive "generosity" in handing over 49% of his idea was costing 49% of the profits, and others were the primary creators. Gotta hurt - his idea, run with by the "talent" and heis only making 51% of the money!</p> <p>This is something the big shots would never ever do, and I suppose that's what he would like to become. but unfortunately the focus on being a wealthy big-shot is why businesspeople only ACQUIRE good ideas, and never create them - welcome to their world Andrew! you'd better acquire something really great really soon, or very few people will even give a rat's a$$ what you think about anything. And this time, don't make the mistake of handing half of your future earnings over to the first pretty face that responds to your internet ad...</p> At the beginning of today I had no idea who either of these people were, but it’s been super-slow at work so I spent the time googling their little mudfight and you know what? This ANdrew is clearly the victim of the deadly sins of GREED & PRIDE, he realized his naive “generosity” in handing over 49% of his idea was costing 49% of the profits, and others were the primary creators. Gotta hurt – his idea, run with by the “talent” and heis only making 51% of the money!

This is something the big shots would never ever do, and I suppose that’s what he would like to become. but unfortunately the focus on being a wealthy big-shot is why businesspeople only ACQUIRE good ideas, and never create them – welcome to their world Andrew! you’d better acquire something really great really soon, or very few people will even give a rat’s a$$ what you think about anything. And this time, don’t make the mistake of handing half of your future earnings over to the first pretty face that responds to your internet ad…

]]> By: Sabina http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-188 Sabina Thu, 31 May 2007 20:49:19 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-188 <p>How can i become a saint?</p> How can i become a saint?

]]> By: NewTeeVee » Rocketboom Brings in $250K in ‘06 http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-187 NewTeeVee » Rocketboom Brings in $250K in ‘06 Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:22:55 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-187 <p>[…] Andrew Michael Baron, sometimes overly open about his personal business, posted an interesting disclosure on his blog this morning: his raw revenue numbers. Rocketboom brought in $247,412 in 2006 (well, the working was unclear so this could be his personal take, but since he’s the business guy the number’s probably the Rocketboom take), Baron reports, with $210,000 of that in advertising and the rest primarily consulting and merchandising. […]</p> […] Andrew Michael Baron, sometimes overly open about his personal business, posted an interesting disclosure on his blog this morning: his raw revenue numbers. Rocketboom brought in $247,412 in 2006 (well, the working was unclear so this could be his personal take, but since he’s the business guy the number’s probably the Rocketboom take), Baron reports, with $210,000 of that in advertising and the rest primarily consulting and merchandising. […]

]]> By: Anonymous http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-186 Anonymous Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:00:22 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-186 <p>Nothing would warm my heart more than to see Amanda and Andrew be friends again.</p> <p>I feel for Andrew though, sometimes you gotta just let it all out. And that's especially hard to do when there are legal matters involved.</p> Nothing would warm my heart more than to see Amanda and Andrew be friends again.

I feel for Andrew though, sometimes you gotta just let it all out. And that’s especially hard to do when there are legal matters involved.

]]> By: Allen http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-185 Allen Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:25:52 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-185 <p>I certainly hope they can work this out because it really hurts both of them, especially Amanda as she just started something new.</p> I certainly hope they can work this out because it really hurts both of them, especially Amanda as she just started something new.

]]> By: Chuck Olsen http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-184 Chuck Olsen Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:15:31 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-184 <p>(Still at it, Allen?)</p> <p>Amanda's response is here: <a href="http://amandacongdon.com/blog/?p=6" rel="nofollow">http://amandacongdon.com/blog/?p=6</a></p> (Still at it, Allen?)

Amanda’s response is here:
http://amandacongdon.com/blog/?p=6

]]> By: Allen http://newteevee.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-183 Allen Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:18:38 +0000 http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/andrew-vs-amanda-part-ii/#comment-183 <p>Paul - I called this new show a disgrace to female video bloggers earlier in the week. While that might have been a bit harsh, the show is a SNL or MadTV skit on a real news network. http://www.centernetworks.com/amanda-congdon-video-disappointing-disgrace-to-women</p> <p>She opens with a skit about JavaScript, something the majority of ABC News viewers have no idea about.</p> <p>And now she is stealing traffic from Rocketboom? wow.</p> Paul – I called this new show a disgrace to female video bloggers earlier in the week. While that might have been a bit harsh, the show is a SNL or MadTV skit on a real news network.
http://www.centernetworks.com/amanda-congdon-video-disappointing-disgrace-to-women

She opens with a skit about JavaScript, something the majority of ABC News viewers have no idea about.

And now she is stealing traffic from Rocketboom? wow.

]]>