<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podtech Signs Ryanne Hodson and Jay Dedman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee &#187; CNET Video Incubator Getting Started</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>NewTeeVee &#187; CNET Video Incubator Getting Started</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[&#8230;] Up to twenty thousand dollars will be made available to production teams, along with professional advice and the promise of whatever resources they can wrangle from CNET. Creators will own their own content &#8212; what Project Spotlight is asking for is exclusivity for some period of time after the content debuts, similar to the deal Jay Dedman and Ryanne Hodson signed with Podtech. [&#8230;]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Up to twenty thousand dollars will be made available to production teams, along with professional advice and the promise of whatever resources they can wrangle from CNET. Creators will own their own content &#8212; what Project Spotlight is asking for is exclusivity for some period of time after the content debuts, similar to the deal Jay Dedman and Ryanne Hodson signed with Podtech. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeJoe</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just how the heck do you know how much money they are making? They are not a public company and you are just making assumptions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you bothered to look at their site you would notice they have plenty of sponsors who are advertising. Actually, unlike your blog which has an empty ad &quot;Advertise on GigaOm&quot; - all their ad slots are filled.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe you should stop crapping on other start-ups and focus on doing your homework, then maybe I will actually read this stupid blog more than once every three months. Then maybe you guys will have some revenue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t believe GigaOM, which is a media company is calling into question how another media company could possibly make money.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just how the heck do you know how much money they are making? They are not a public company and you are just making assumptions.</p>
<p>If you bothered to look at their site you would notice they have plenty of sponsors who are advertising. Actually, unlike your blog which has an empty ad &#8220;Advertise on GigaOm&#8221; &#8211; all their ad slots are filled.</p>
<p>Maybe you should stop crapping on other start-ups and focus on doing your homework, then maybe I will actually read this stupid blog more than once every three months. Then maybe you guys will have some revenue.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe GigaOM, which is a media company is calling into question how another media company could possibly make money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Olsen</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;(I don&#039;t doubt Scoble and Furrier will bring in the moneys&#8230;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For a bunch more vlog-related news (Jay &amp; Ryan, Network2, etc.) I&#039;ve got a post up&#8230; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogumentary.typepad.com/chuck/2006/12/vlog_shoutouts_.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vlog Shoutouts, Happenings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I don&#8217;t doubt Scoble and Furrier will bring in the moneys&#8230;)</p>
<p>For a bunch more vlog-related news (Jay &amp; Ryan, Network2, etc.) I&#8217;ve got a post up&#8230; <a href="http://blogumentary.typepad.com/chuck/2006/12/vlog_shoutouts_.html" rel="nofollow">Vlog Shoutouts, Happenings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No revenue? You might check again. We have lots of corporate clients. Seagate sponsored my show (and is paying me a good amount to do it).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, you&#039;re right. VCs are expecting a good revenue story and our VCs are the best in the business.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No revenue? You might check again. We have lots of corporate clients. Seagate sponsored my show (and is paying me a good amount to do it).</p>
<p>But, you&#8217;re right. VCs are expecting a good revenue story and our VCs are the best in the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/18/podtech-signs-ryanne-hodson-and-jay-dedman/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Podtech needs to do more than make money. They took $5 million from a top tier VC. The VC will expect 10x their money back over the expected 3-5 years before liquidity. Let&#039;s assume the VC took 25% of the company. 10x their money is of course $50 million. That means Podtech needs to see be worth at least $200 million for the VC&#039;s to cash out at the level they EXPECT. (Not taking into account future funding rounds and dilution). Furrier, the Scobles and everyone else there had darn well better figure out how to be worth $200 million (market cap-wise) from what is essentially no revenue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Podtech needs to do more than make money. They took $5 million from a top tier VC. The VC will expect 10x their money back over the expected 3-5 years before liquidity. Let&#8217;s assume the VC took 25% of the company. 10x their money is of course $50 million. That means Podtech needs to see be worth at least $200 million for the VC&#8217;s to cash out at the level they EXPECT. (Not taking into account future funding rounds and dilution). Furrier, the Scobles and everyone else there had darn well better figure out how to be worth $200 million (market cap-wise) from what is essentially no revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
