<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSM Ignores Edwards&#8217; YouTube Debut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2006/12/28/msm-ignores-edwards-youtube-debut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/28/msm-ignores-edwards-youtube-debut/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Day</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/28/msm-ignores-edwards-youtube-debut/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/msm-ignores-edwards-youtube-debut/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This may be video heresy, but what I expected (and, it seems, what a lot of videobloggers might have hoped for) was coverage that declared Edwards &quot;The videoblogging Presidential Candidate&quot; (or, more likely, &quot;the YouTube Candidate&quot;).   In the long run, one would have to hope that the most interesting thing about Edwards is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; that he happens to have a YouTube account.  The mainstream media might have don Edwards a favour in the long run by glossing over his onlin ambitions, noble as they are&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be video heresy, but what I expected (and, it seems, what a lot of videobloggers might have hoped for) was coverage that declared Edwards &#8220;The videoblogging Presidential Candidate&#8221; (or, more likely, &#8220;the YouTube Candidate&#8221;).   In the long run, one would have to hope that the most interesting thing about Edwards is <em>not</em> that he happens to have a YouTube account.  The mainstream media might have don Edwards a favour in the long run by glossing over his onlin ambitions, noble as they are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Calman</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2006/12/28/msm-ignores-edwards-youtube-debut/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Calman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2006/12/28/msm-ignores-edwards-youtube-debut/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dan Balz from Washington Post posted an update to the story last night on washingtonpost.com and it actually made A-1 of the paper today. FINALLY! But I&#039;ve seen little else.  Given that the Post just lost two of its biggest political stars to the web&#8230;(Vandehyde and Harris to Politico.com,) I would think that they are very sensitive right now to getting things &quot;right&quot; with the online community.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Balz from Washington Post posted an update to the story last night on washingtonpost.com and it actually made A-1 of the paper today. FINALLY! But I&#8217;ve seen little else.  Given that the Post just lost two of its biggest political stars to the web&#8230;(Vandehyde and Harris to Politico.com,) I would think that they are very sensitive right now to getting things &#8220;right&#8221; with the online community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
