<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRM Alternatives: Q&amp;A with Steve O&#8217;Hear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/02/26/drm-alternatives-qa-with-steve-ohear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/02/26/drm-alternatives-qa-with-steve-ohear/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/02/26/drm-alternatives-qa-with-steve-ohear/#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/drm-alternatives-qa-with-steve-ohear/#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;We retain full copyright. It’s not Creative Commons. The problem with a CC license, is most people use the non-commercial one, which doesn’t really help the next generation of filmmaker because even recouping costs is commercial. We had months of clearing rights to use images, et cetera.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;About 1/3 of work published under a CC license does permit commercial use.  Flickr and other sites allow you to search for images and other content under liberal CC licenses that permit commercial use, see http://search.creativecommons.org&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;O&#039;Hears choice of licensing for the end product (his films) is a somewhat separate issue.  Depending on the non-original content incorporated O&#039;Hearn could release under a range of CC licenses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IANAL. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We retain full copyright. It’s not Creative Commons. The problem with a CC license, is most people use the non-commercial one, which doesn’t really help the next generation of filmmaker because even recouping costs is commercial. We had months of clearing rights to use images, et cetera.&#8221;</p>
<p>About 1/3 of work published under a CC license does permit commercial use.  Flickr and other sites allow you to search for images and other content under liberal CC licenses that permit commercial use, see <a href="http://search.creativecommons.org" rel="nofollow">http://search.creativecommons.org</a></p>
<p>O&#8217;Hears choice of licensing for the end product (his films) is a somewhat separate issue.  Depending on the non-original content incorporated O&#8217;Hearn could release under a range of CC licenses.</p>
<p>IANAL. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eirikso.com &#187; Interesting alternative to DRM</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/02/26/drm-alternatives-qa-with-steve-ohear/#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>eirikso.com &#187; Interesting alternative to DRM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/drm-alternatives-qa-with-steve-ohear/#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] to other sites discussing Streamburst: DRM Alternatives: Q&amp;A with Steve O&#8217;Hear Film about Apple founders released DRM-free DRM and creativity Social DRM   Listen to this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to other sites discussing Streamburst: DRM Alternatives: Q&#38;A with Steve O&#8217;Hear Film about Apple founders released DRM-free DRM and creativity Social DRM   Listen to this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
