<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blinkx to IPO for $150-500M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee &#187; Blinkx 'IPO' Raises $50 M</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3307</link>
		<dc:creator>NewTeeVee &#187; Blinkx 'IPO' Raises $50 M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] If our pounds-sterling-to-dollars math is right, it looks like video search engine startup Blinkx raised nearly $50 million Tuesday in its unique &#8220;public offering,&#8221; a complex stock arrangement with parent company Autonomy that Liz detailed previously here. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If our pounds-sterling-to-dollars math is right, it looks like video search engine startup Blinkx raised nearly $50 million Tuesday in its unique &#8220;public offering,&#8221; a complex stock arrangement with parent company Autonomy that Liz detailed previously here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee &#187; Video Funding Keeps on Coming</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3306</link>
		<dc:creator>NewTeeVee &#187; Video Funding Keeps on Coming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 21:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is out to raise 25 million pounds ($49 million) in its IPO, for a market capitalization of 114 million pounds ($225 million). We continue to think that seems [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is out to raise 25 million pounds ($49 million) in its IPO, for a market capitalization of 114 million pounds ($225 million). We continue to think that seems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlogger</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3300</link>
		<dc:creator>vlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3300</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bah!  This will be a flop, or dead within a few years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah!  This will be a flop, or dead within a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gannes</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3303</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Gannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree there are already public internet TV companies -- GoFish would be another. But I was making a distinction between them and new free web service (ok fine, web 2.0) video startups, which to my knowledge remain private.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree there are already public internet TV companies &#8212; GoFish would be another. But I was making a distinction between them and new free web service (ok fine, web 2.0) video startups, which to my knowledge remain private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iolo Jones</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Iolo Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good analysis, except there are a number of internet tv companies already public: Narrowstep (NRWS), Roo Group (RGRP) and Jump TV being three of them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RGRP and NRWS are well below their flotation prices, whereas Jump TV achieved an extraordinary valuation by listing in London rather than the US.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis, except there are a number of internet tv companies already public: Narrowstep (NRWS), Roo Group (RGRP) and Jump TV being three of them.</p>
<p>RGRP and NRWS are well below their flotation prices, whereas Jump TV achieved an extraordinary valuation by listing in London rather than the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latent</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3301</link>
		<dc:creator>latent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3301</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;a consumer destination complete with its own billboard on Highway 101 near San Francisco.&lt;&lt;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;that billboard has been home to over-spend-til-you&#039;re-dead dot-coms for 10 years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>a consumer destination complete with its own billboard on Highway 101 near San Francisco.&lt;&lt;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>that billboard has been home to over-spend-til-you&#8217;re-dead dot-coms for 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; Blinkx, finally serves its purpose</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3304</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; Blinkx, finally serves its purpose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Liz points out the company has neither the traffic nor traction to really justify a $150-to-500 million dollar IPO. Still it has two buzz words going for it - [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liz points out the company has neither the traffic nor traction to really justify a $150-to-500 million dollar IPO. Still it has two buzz words going for it &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard Lindzon</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>howard Lindzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/blinkx-to-ipo-for-150-500m/#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;oy - mess.  Congrats to entrepreneurs but once again shows the depths at which bankers will go in a bull market&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oy &#8211; mess.  Congrats to entrepreneurs but once again shows the depths at which bankers will go in a bull market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
