Hollywood’s Loss of the Public’s Trust
Hollywood has been forced into a prisoner’s dilemma by new technology, where the industry seems convinced that its self interest and that of the audience are at odds. In fact, if they could trust each other (see below), they might both get what they want.
Two recent pieces illustrate this schizophrenic split between Hollywood’s public statements and their private fears. On the one hand, consumers are king, and Hollywood just wants to give them what they want. On the other, consumers are thieving bastards who can’t be trusted.
The goal of DRM should be “to make things simpler for the consumer,” Dan Glickman proclaimed in a LexisNexis conference speech at the Beverly Hills Four Seasons covered by Ars Technica today. He further suggested that he saw no problem with users copying content to portable devices and home servers. He even invited stakeholders to convene a “technology summit.”
One way to make the consumer experience easier would be wireless transmission of HD signals directly to a big-screen display, such as a new system developed by Samsung for its 50″ and larger wide-screen plasma displays. But content companies are paranoid that the signal isn’t secure enough, holding up the release of the displays, according to reports confirmed by Ars Technica yesterday.
Ignoring the facts that DRM has never been about enabling consumers but instead disabling features, and that a wifi signal, encrypted or otherwise, is no more or less secure than any current DRM schemes, it’s this kind of “we love you, we love you not” vacillation on the part of content providers that can’t help build sympathy for the entertainment industry’s position.
How do consumers feel? Thirty-five percent of UK residents and 46 percent of French residents in the coveted 18- to 34-year-old demo “did not think entertainment companies respected the rights of people who pay for digital entertainment,” according to Variety’s summary of a study by Edelman. The logic of this position seems simple enough: Hollywood doesn’t trust me but still wants my money, so why the hell should I trust Hollywood and give them any?
Comments (1)
Linkbacks (1)
-
[...] Ars Technica following up to statements made by MPAA head Dan Glickman. Glickman is a proponent of DRM interoperability and home-copying (at a [...]
Leave a Reply
Popular
- BitTorrent After The Pirate Bay: Do You Still Need Trackers?
- Tumblr Marriage Proposal: Behind the Scenes of Justin and Marissa's Engagement
- Get Ready for Flash Player 10.1 to Stream P2P Video to Millions, Swap Files BitTorrent-style
- Ten Sites for Free and Legal Torrents
- The Megawoosh Waterslide Viral: How It Was Really Done
- Six Steps To Get More HD From Your Scientific Atlanta Set-top Box
Recent
- BitTorrent After The Pirate Bay: Do You Still Need Trackers?
- Microsoft and Nielsen Partner for 1 vs. 100 Measurement
- Premium Content Drives Connected Device Adoption
- Site Sponsor: Twistage
- Tumblr Marriage Proposal: Behind the Scenes of Justin and Marissa’s Engagement
- Sungale’s Sub-par Portable Media Player
Network
- Skype CEO Outlines Platform Ambitions, Hiring Plans [GigaOM]
- Earth2Tech Week in Review [Earth2Tech]
- WWD Weekend Reading List [WebWorkerDaily]
- WinMo Wrap: Marketplace Hits All WM 6.x Phones; Opera Mobile Advances [jkOnTheRun]
- Weekly App Store Picks: November 21, 2009 [TheAppleBlog]
- Get Ready for Flash Player 10.1 to Stream P2P Video to Millions, Swap Files BitTorrent-style [NewTeeVee]
© 2009 The GigaOM Network. Marketing consulting by ACS.


This is why I havn
t purchased any music or DVDs from the major labels for years.This sort of behavior from the industry MAKES ME PROUD to be a illegal file sharer. Well, not really illegal, since the country I live in is not controlled by those sick American companies and I can download & upload to my hearts content.
It
s my way of protesting, I just dont buy content, any content, no music, no DVDs, no HD-DVD or BlueRay and no software, its all available, on the net, FOR FREE. If the industry were not such bastards, I would have purchased all this content, but now Im all setup to copy, anything and everything. Now, I dont know if I`ll ever pay for content AGAIN, EVER AGAIN.Your losing customers, not just for a while, but for life…..