<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Bud.tv Survive Death Throes for &#8220;Edgy&#8221; Comeback?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: R.I.P. Bud.tv&#160;&#124;&#160;Viral Video Maker</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-254661</link>
		<dc:creator>R.I.P. Bud.tv&#160;&#124;&#160;Viral Video Maker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-254661</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] OK to try new things. Bud.tv was a bit of a running joke at NTV HQ as almost every writer posted a story on it, but despite the failure, at least the company adopted a relatively new technology [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OK to try new things. Bud.tv was a bit of a running joke at NTV HQ as almost every writer posted a story on it, but despite the failure, at least the company adopted a relatively new technology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.I.P. Bud.tv &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-254654</link>
		<dc:creator>R.I.P. Bud.tv &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-254654</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] OK to try new things. Bud.tv was a bit of a running joke at NTV HQ as almost every writer posted a story on it, but despite the failure, at least the company adopted a relatively new technology [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OK to try new things. Bud.tv was a bit of a running joke at NTV HQ as almost every writer posted a story on it, but despite the failure, at least the company adopted a relatively new technology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Rubens</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Rubens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment Chris.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am not at all against Bud on the internet.  I agree that advertising dollars are going to be an increasingly important part of monetizing a variety of facets of web content, especially video content.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I wrote this article because I think it is very telling of the difficulties for &quot;old&quot; media advertising giants to cross into &quot;new&quot; media.  Bud has had some of the most successful (and expensive) ad campaigns in history (the frogs, &quot;wassup!&quot;) and it says something about this new advertising realm when their first big venture online doesn&#039;t go as planned.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not every attempt to advertise online has or will work and looking at why the failures failed is just an important as why the successes were successful.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Chris.</p>
<p>I am not at all against Bud on the internet.  I agree that advertising dollars are going to be an increasingly important part of monetizing a variety of facets of web content, especially video content.</p>
<p>However, I wrote this article because I think it is very telling of the difficulties for &#8220;old&#8221; media advertising giants to cross into &#8220;new&#8221; media.  Bud has had some of the most successful (and expensive) ad campaigns in history (the frogs, &#8220;wassup!&#8221;) and it says something about this new advertising realm when their first big venture online doesn&#8217;t go as planned.</p>
<p>Not every attempt to advertise online has or will work and looking at why the failures failed is just an important as why the successes were successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chirs</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4078</link>
		<dc:creator>Chirs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 03:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Craig, I&#039;m confused by your position on this. It seems you&#039;d prefer Bud leave the internet alone. You can&#039;t possibly be against a major advertiser trying to do something newish with their online ad budget, can you? If big advertisers are going to keep increasing their online budgets they&#039;re going to want to find new ways to advertise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t advertising one of the things that is supposed to keep the money coming into this internet thing? Don&#039;t you think it&#039;ll be better when they find some more creative solutions than banners?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, I&#8217;m confused by your position on this. It seems you&#8217;d prefer Bud leave the internet alone. You can&#8217;t possibly be against a major advertiser trying to do something newish with their online ad budget, can you? If big advertisers are going to keep increasing their online budgets they&#8217;re going to want to find new ways to advertise.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t advertising one of the things that is supposed to keep the money coming into this internet thing? Don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;ll be better when they find some more creative solutions than banners?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson West</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4079</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4079</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t understand why they don&#039;t brand the content and then plaster it everywhere, a la &quot;No Good TV.&quot;  There doesn&#039;t seem to be any problem with advertising beer to kids during televised sporting events (&quot;This game brought to you by Bud and Bud Light&quot;) so why not just sponsor the content and let it go free?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sigh.  Dud.tv it is!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why they don&#8217;t brand the content and then plaster it everywhere, a la &#8220;No Good TV.&#8221;  There doesn&#8217;t seem to be any problem with advertising beer to kids during televised sporting events (&#8220;This game brought to you by Bud and Bud Light&#8221;) so why not just sponsor the content and let it go free?</p>
<p>Sigh.  Dud.tv it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revilo</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Revilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, I just went to watch it and they require a valid ID with first and last name.. not a chance. Do they really think i am going to give them that info to watch crappy crap.. uggh. porn is easier..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I just went to watch it and they require a valid ID with first and last name.. not a chance. Do they really think i am going to give them that info to watch crappy crap.. uggh. porn is easier..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall  Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall  Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/budtv-comeback/#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When they add video chat with a &quot;beer goggles&quot; filter then we&#039;re really in trouble.  Was that too obvious a joke?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they add video chat with a &#8220;beer goggles&#8221; filter then we&#8217;re really in trouble.  Was that too obvious a joke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
