Written by Craig Rubens
Posted Sunday, June 17, 2007 at 4:54 PM PT

 

YouTube’s Disappointing New Editing Tools

Late Friday evening YouTube rolled out its new on-site editing service, YouTube Remixer. Powered by Adobe Premiere Express, the software allows YouTubers to remix their existing videos adding new music, borders, clip art graphics, and transitions (though I’m very sad that the star wipe did not make the cut). YouTube Remixer is exactly the same as Photobucket’s Remixer (previous coverage here), except that Photobucket launched theirs back in February and it has far more features.

youtube-remixer2.jpg

While definitely not for the savvier of video uploaders, the Remixer might be useful for the increasing number of users uploading from their mobile phones. Adding credits to your camera-phone documentary on that cute puppy you saw in the park ensures that The Academy will know who to give the Oscar to.

Additionally, YouTube rolled out a beta version of its new video page layout, “Watch 3.0.” Mostly just a rearrangements of the old page elements, the beta prominently lists the current videomaker’s other videos and has a (very) slightly bigger video player. YouTube has also revamped its search results page, allowing you to view the results in either “list view” or “grid view.” On the uploading side of things, YouTube now includes a Google maplet allowing users to geotag their videos with new precision.

Choosing Adobe as a vendor is a blow to startups who have made online video editing their sole purpose. Last week one such company, Cuts, sold itself, admitting it did not see great opportunity in the crowded market.

Honestly, this is a massively underwhelming showing from YouTube. Since Google acquired YouTube, not much has happened to the technical capabilities of the site. Last week YouTube finally rolled out a beefier embed player but it still lacks many of the features that other video sites offer. While far and away the most popular video site, YouTube seems to be stagnating. All of these features have been available elsewhere for months.

Giving its users a watered-down, glitchier version of Photobucket’s four-month-old Remixer is downright insulting. I would have expected more from YouTube. Last month’s Wired Magazine was right: “Expired, Buying YouTube. Tired, Suing YouTube. Wired, Competing with YouTube.”

 

Sphere
Topic: Software
« Previous Post Next Post »

Comments & Trackbacks

  1. One problem…

    “wired, competing with youtube.”…

    Competing with a company with no decent business model that was clearly massively overvalued?

    You have got to be kidding me. Not to say there isn’t plenty of competition out there but youtube is the largest by far and only made $15 mill last year. Not likely that many of the others are doing all that crash hot.

    Pat on June 17th, 2007 at 8:59 pm - Permalink
  2. Just tried the new Youtube online video editing service. Great for simple cuts and sub-titles…

    Adrian Lee :: VideoLane.com on June 18th, 2007 at 12:48 am - Permalink
  3. [...] its popularity is still to come out with a highly differentiating user experience ( As lamented by Craig Rubens at NewTeeVee.com) . How has been your experience with Photobucket, Yahoo video or YouTube? Do you feel that the [...]

    » YouTubers can now edit videos on the fly | Tech News | TechRepublic.com on June 18th, 2007 at 5:44 am - Permalink
  4. [...] Elements 3.0. Consider this YouTube effort part handy video editing tool and part marketing pitch. NewTeeVee says Remixer is disappointing and raises an interesting question: Did Google sacrifice better tools from startups to go with Adobe? The answer: Follow the [...]

    » YouTube unveils mashup tools dubbed Remixer | Between the Lines | ZDNet.com on June 18th, 2007 at 9:12 am - Permalink
  5. [...] información aquí. Comparte el artículo:Estos íconos enlazan con webs de marcadores sociales que permiten a los [...]

    WWW.GIGLE.NET » YouTube permite la edicion de videos online on June 18th, 2007 at 9:12 am - Permalink
  6. [...] YouTube’s Remixer debuted to some rather tepid reviews, in part because it is more or less the same software Adobe rolled out with Photobucket in March. [...]

    Video Editing 2.0: 8 Ways to Remix Online Videos  »Technology News | Venture Capital, Startups, Silicon Valley, Web 2.0 Tech on June 18th, 2007 at 1:31 pm - Permalink
  7. [...] Here is a review of it  [...]

    YouTube launches online video editing tools « Cuzoogle on June 18th, 2007 at 1:33 pm - Permalink
  8. What part of “cash out”, as in “check has already cleared” don’t you understand? ;-)

    Great review, by the way.

    Basic Science on June 18th, 2007 at 1:52 pm - Permalink
  9. [...] YouTube’s Remixer debuted to some rather tepid reviews, in part because it is more or less the same software Adobe rolled out with Photobucket in March. [...]

    Video Editing 2.0: 8 Ways to Remix Online Videos : Forecast-Blog on June 18th, 2007 at 1:55 pm - Permalink
  10. Nice one @ basic

    Mike - get paid for surveys on June 18th, 2007 at 2:36 pm - Permalink
  11. [...] YouTube’s Remixer debuted to some rather tepid reviews, in part because it is more or less the same software Adobe rolled out with Photobucket in March. [...]

    mind new media » Video Editing 2.0: 8 Ways to Remix Online Videos on June 18th, 2007 at 4:01 pm - Permalink
  12. Craig, I proposed a partnership between YouTube and Adobe three months ago. I was thinking more along the lines of a limited edition version of Premiere’s software, but maybe they’re just making baby steps. Check out my posts about it:

    Original Proposal: http://socialstrategist.com/2007/03/28/a-profitable-partnership-how-youtube-can-re-revolutionize-personal-publishing
    Successful Prediction: http://socialstrategist.com/2007/06/18/youtube-adobe-partnership-it-happened

    Best,
    Jay

    Jay Neely on June 18th, 2007 at 4:57 pm - Permalink
  13. [...] YouTube’s Disappointing New Editing Tools Late Friday evening YouTube rolled out its new on-site editing service, YouTube Remixer. Powered by Adobe Premiere […] [...]

    Top Posts « WordPress.com on June 18th, 2007 at 4:58 pm - Permalink
  14. [...] YouTube’s Remixer debuted to some rather tepid reviews, in part because it is more or less the same software Adobe rolled out with Photobucket in March. [...]

    Video Editing 2.0 « DazHeath.Co.Uk on June 19th, 2007 at 11:34 pm - Permalink
  15. [...] nota una recensione su NewTeeVee, l’editing video online non è una novità: lo aveva già alcuni mesi fa Photobucket. Sia [...]

    Amoga WebMania » 2007 » Giugno » 23 on June 23rd, 2007 at 1:26 am - Permalink
  16. Geotag Video http://www.videomap.it/en

    mark on August 3rd, 2007 at 2:27 pm - Permalink
  17. [...] the disappointing YouTube Remixer tool (made by Adobe) still says “music (coming soon),” Flektor gives [...]

    Flektor: Web Tools Don’t Have To Be Simple « NewTeeVee on September 19th, 2007 at 12:00 am - Permalink
  18. [...] YouTube’s Remixer debuted to some rather tepid reviews, in part because it is more or less the same software Adobe rolled out with Photobucket in March. [...]

    Video Editing 2.0: 8 Ways to Remix Online Videos « Remixing Cinema on December 12th, 2007 at 3:57 pm - Permalink
  19. This sounds good for people who aren’t experienced in professional editing and who can’t afford a decent package just to edit their mobile phone videos.

    So I support Youtube’s video editor :)

    Marie on February 5th, 2008 at 4:00 am - Permalink
  20. [...] added the option to geotag videos when they’re uploaded a little over a year ago, but didn’t [...]

    YouTube Adding Geosearch « NewTeeVee on July 10th, 2008 at 4:20 pm - Permalink
  21. thanks for the informations

    izlesene on July 14th, 2008 at 10:16 am - Permalink
  22. [...] Adding some video editing punch wouldn’t be a bad idea for YouTube; Craig was less than pleased with the company’s first attempt. [...]

    Google Buys Omnisio for YouTube « NewTeeVee on July 30th, 2008 at 3:43 pm - Permalink

Leave a reply








Safari hates me

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have gotten caught in our trusty (but occasionally overly ambitious) spam filter. Please drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.