<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood Strike: Good for Online Video, Bad for UGC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/07/20/hollywood-strike-good-for-online-video-bad-for-ugc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/20/hollywood-strike-good-for-online-video-bad-for-ugc/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: prodco</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/20/hollywood-strike-good-for-online-video-bad-for-ugc/#comment-49538</link>
		<dc:creator>prodco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/20/hollywood-strike-good-for-online-video-bad-for-ugc/#comment-49538</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Unions are somewhat akin to DRM.  They are seeking to control and grab revenue where little or non-exist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the Unions were smart (which they aren&#039;t), they would find methods to encourage their membership to be working within the internet television space now, even though the economics aren&#039;t there yet.  They&#039;d create a flat fee per episode if &quot;first window&quot; was internet broadcast and leave it up to each writer to do some equity/profit deal on their own (plus, writers could control spin-offs, sequels, etc. if a show moved to Broadcast and those minimums would apply).   And, the Minimum for an episode would be in the $500 range.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seems like the highest budget internet television series (i.e. professional content) are IN THE MOTHERHOOD, which looks to be over $10K/episode, alamoheightsSA was in the $5-10K range, and PROMQUEEN was around $2K (albeit for :90 seconds).    I doubt the writers on any of those shows received more than $500/episode?  Would be interesting to find out?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, a WGA writer (or, the Union) is going to be looking for a bare minimum of what?  $1-3K per episode for something under :10 minutes.  Maybe more.  Plus, they want residuals that are impossible to calculate based on viewership (can only be revenue/profit based).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There will be a Strike.  And, akin to 1988, the world will change.  The writers will lose (the last Strike created the onset of &quot;reality&quot; television and put many writers out of business).  This strike may be the Unions shooting themselves in both feet, and knees.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best suggestion is:  Make a WGA writer an Executive Producer on your show.  Provide them with Fees, plus equity.  Screw the Unions, unless they are willing to work within the reality of the business (a 5% of Budget, flat, would suffice).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Unions are somewhat akin to DRM.  They are seeking to control and grab revenue where little or non-exist.</p>
<p>If the Unions were smart (which they aren&#8217;t), they would find methods to encourage their membership to be working within the internet television space now, even though the economics aren&#8217;t there yet.  They&#8217;d create a flat fee per episode if &#8220;first window&#8221; was internet broadcast and leave it up to each writer to do some equity/profit deal on their own (plus, writers could control spin-offs, sequels, etc. if a show moved to Broadcast and those minimums would apply).   And, the Minimum for an episode would be in the $500 range.</p>
<p>Seems like the highest budget internet television series (i.e. professional content) are IN THE MOTHERHOOD, which looks to be over $10K/episode, alamoheightsSA was in the $5-10K range, and PROMQUEEN was around $2K (albeit for :90 seconds).    I doubt the writers on any of those shows received more than $500/episode?  Would be interesting to find out?</p>
<p>But, a WGA writer (or, the Union) is going to be looking for a bare minimum of what?  $1-3K per episode for something under :10 minutes.  Maybe more.  Plus, they want residuals that are impossible to calculate based on viewership (can only be revenue/profit based).</p>
<p>There will be a Strike.  And, akin to 1988, the world will change.  The writers will lose (the last Strike created the onset of &#8220;reality&#8221; television and put many writers out of business).  This strike may be the Unions shooting themselves in both feet, and knees.</p>
<p>Best suggestion is:  Make a WGA writer an Executive Producer on your show.  Provide them with Fees, plus equity.  Screw the Unions, unless they are willing to work within the reality of the business (a 5% of Budget, flat, would suffice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
