<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican Edition of YouTube Debate on the Rocks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Chen: Videos Provide More Political Context &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-245387</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Chen: Videos Provide More Political Context &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-245387</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] videos, but there was no mention of additional debate participation, indicating that there are no melting snowmen in the cards for future [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] videos, but there was no mention of additional debate participation, indicating that there are no melting snowmen in the cards for future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican YouTube Debate a Snoozer &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-178116</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican YouTube Debate a Snoozer &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-178116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] were no melting snowman questions to trivialize Mitt Romney&#8217;s participation, but there was some goofiness, like this homemade candidate roundup ditty. As for content, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were no melting snowman questions to trivialize Mitt Romney&#8217;s participation, but there was some goofiness, like this homemade candidate roundup ditty. As for content, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Numbers You Should Know: Beyond TV; YouTube Uploads; 5,000 ?s for GOP &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-175678</link>
		<dc:creator>Numbers You Should Know: Beyond TV; YouTube Uploads; 5,000 ?s for GOP &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-175678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the Republican YouTube debates, which were at one time at risk of getting canceled, seem to be quite [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Republican YouTube debates, which were at one time at risk of getting canceled, seem to be quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee Monday Morning Vid-Biz Headlines &#171;</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-60082</link>
		<dc:creator>NewTeeVee Monday Morning Vid-Biz Headlines &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-60082</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Morning Vid-Biz&#160;Headlines Republican YouTube Debate Postponed? As we wrote last week, leading GOP candidates haven&#8217;t been enthusiastic about participating in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Morning Vid-Biz&nbsp;Headlines Republican YouTube Debate Postponed? As we wrote last week, leading GOP candidates haven&#8217;t been enthusiastic about participating in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill O. Rights</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-58020</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill O. Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-58020</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul is so dominant on YouTube that Giuliani and Romney are scared of the home court advantage Ron Paul would have. In short, they are cowards. Glad to see McCain has some courage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of the Republican candidates, Ron Paul is 1st in YouTube, Meetup, MySpace, Technorati, Alexa, Google, etc. The old media is just too slow to realize what is happening.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ron Paul places 1st or 2nd in every straw poll, debate, and active participation survey.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dr. Ron Paul has the most contributions from U.S. military personnel &amp; veterans above all other candidates. So support the troops and vote Ron Paul!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are making history – Vote Ron Paul!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Visit YouTube and search Ron Paul to learn more…&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is so dominant on YouTube that Giuliani and Romney are scared of the home court advantage Ron Paul would have. In short, they are cowards. Glad to see McCain has some courage.</p>
<p>Of the Republican candidates, Ron Paul is 1st in YouTube, Meetup, MySpace, Technorati, Alexa, Google, etc. The old media is just too slow to realize what is happening.</p>
<p>Ron Paul places 1st or 2nd in every straw poll, debate, and active participation survey.</p>
<p>Dr. Ron Paul has the most contributions from U.S. military personnel &amp; veterans above all other candidates. So support the troops and vote Ron Paul!</p>
<p>We are making history – Vote Ron Paul!</p>
<p>Visit YouTube and search Ron Paul to learn more…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PEARSON: Debate put us in demand - NEWS.Tuls.Net</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-57639</link>
		<dc:creator>PEARSON: Debate put us in demand - NEWS.Tuls.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-57639</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] News:NewTeeVee: Republican Edition of YouTube Debate on the Rocks?Washington Post: YOUTUBE, TAKE TWO Few GOP Candidates Commit to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News:NewTeeVee: Republican Edition of YouTube Debate on the Rocks?Washington Post: YOUTUBE, TAKE TWO Few GOP Candidates Commit to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee Friday Vid Picks: Best of the Debate Rejects &#171;</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-56812</link>
		<dc:creator>NewTeeVee Friday Vid Picks: Best of the Debate Rejects &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-56812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] page from YouTube. Also, submissions are being accepted for the September 17 Republican Debate (that is, if it goes through), so start [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] page from YouTube. Also, submissions are being accepted for the September 17 Republican Debate (that is, if it goes through), so start [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. L. Friedman</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-56593</link>
		<dc:creator>A. L. Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/26/republican-edition-of-youtube-debate-on-the-rocks/#comment-56593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the youtube debates weren&#039;t really game-changing and a little knee-jerkish (info week compared them to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/07/youtubes_reign.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;virgin sacrifice to the youtube gods&lt;/a&gt;), but even poorly implemented forward-thinking political stunts are forward-thinking nonetheless.  if the repubs want to look even more like square old fat white dudes who are scared of change, avoiding the youtube debate is a good move.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the youtube debates weren&#8217;t really game-changing and a little knee-jerkish (info week compared them to a <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/07/youtubes_reign.html" rel="nofollow">virgin sacrifice to the youtube gods</a>), but even poorly implemented forward-thinking political stunts are forward-thinking nonetheless.  if the repubs want to look even more like square old fat white dudes who are scared of change, avoiding the youtube debate is a good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
