<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Web Video Ready for an HD Upgrade?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-246877</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-246877</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i think HD is to far away for web bcoz it needs so much bandwidth and also high level of hardwares so i think it will take around 5 to 6 years to be come out.and i have seen now mostly everybody is looking for HD files, so lets hope for the best....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think HD is to far away for web bcoz it needs so much bandwidth and also high level of hardwares so i think it will take around 5 to 6 years to be come out.and i have seen now mostly everybody is looking for HD files, so lets hope for the best&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bandwidth Crisis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Viva La HD Revolution!</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-232559</link>
		<dc:creator>Bandwidth Crisis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Viva La HD Revolution!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-232559</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] was only last month that we questioned whether HD online mattered, and Om asked last summer if web video was ready for an upgrade. From the flurry of recent announcements, it looks like the answer to both question is [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was only last month that we questioned whether HD online mattered, and Om asked last summer if web video was ready for an upgrade. From the flurry of recent announcements, it looks like the answer to both question is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldweys</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-229451</link>
		<dc:creator>oldweys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-229451</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…]looks like the answer to both question is […]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…]looks like the answer to both question is […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viva La HD Revolution! &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-193892</link>
		<dc:creator>Viva La HD Revolution! &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-193892</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] It was only last month that we questioned whether HD online mattered, and Om asked last summer if web video was ready for an upgrade. From the flurry of recent announcements, it looks like the answer to both question is [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It was only last month that we questioned whether HD online mattered, and Om asked last summer if web video was ready for an upgrade. From the flurry of recent announcements, it looks like the answer to both question is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does HD Online Matter? AOL, CBS Say No &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-131648</link>
		<dc:creator>Does HD Online Matter? AOL, CBS Say No &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-131648</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] wrote a few months ago that the economics of delivering HD online are changing, making the prospect more affordable. But even super-huge CDN Akamai (AKAM), which is [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a few months ago that the economics of delivering HD online are changing, making the prospect more affordable. But even super-huge CDN Akamai (AKAM), which is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Bandwidth Check&#160;by&#160;freedompictures</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-131289</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Bandwidth Check&#160;by&#160;freedompictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-131289</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Many of us have found a way of smuggling over-sized HD flat panels, past disapproving partner&#8217;s stares, into the living room - and I certainly won&#8217;t be watching Football in Standard Def. ever again. But, at this stage, you have to wonder whether anyone is ready for HD on the web? I know my 3Mbps down isn&#8217;t. Om Malik at NewTeeVee asks the same question. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many of us have found a way of smuggling over-sized HD flat panels, past disapproving partner&#8217;s stares, into the living room &#8211; and I certainly won&#8217;t be watching Football in Standard Def. ever again. But, at this stage, you have to wonder whether anyone is ready for HD on the web? I know my 3Mbps down isn&#8217;t. Om Malik at NewTeeVee asks the same question. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akamai&#8217;s New HD Strategy: Show, Don&#8217;t Tell &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-130352</link>
		<dc:creator>Akamai&#8217;s New HD Strategy: Show, Don&#8217;t Tell &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-130352</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] New HD Strategy: Show, Don&#8217;t&#160;Tell Better video quality sounds great and all, but it&#8217;s not clear there&#8217;s demand for high-definition content online yet. Akamai (AKAM), in an attempt to sign up customers for its new HD offering, is pounding the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New HD Strategy: Show, Don&#8217;t&nbsp;Tell Better video quality sounds great and all, but it&#8217;s not clear there&#8217;s demand for high-definition content online yet. Akamai (AKAM), in an attempt to sign up customers for its new HD offering, is pounding the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ney</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-123296</link>
		<dc:creator>Ney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-123296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Ed!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is flash8 in HD! And I am only using flash9 version for the FullScreen mode.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Flash8 version
http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen/HD_flash8.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Flash9
http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks For the Very Good Feedback!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am looking for a Partner! Anyone?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ed!</p>
<p>This is flash8 in HD! And I am only using flash9 version for the FullScreen mode.</p>
<p>Flash8 version<br />
<a href="http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen/HD_flash8.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen/HD_flash8.html</a></p>
<p>Flash9<br />
<a href="http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen/" rel="nofollow">http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen/</a></p>
<p>Thanks For the Very Good Feedback!</p>
<p>I am looking for a Partner! Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-121771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-121771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fantastic Ney&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Amazing . You&#039;re the leader.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep up good work&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ed&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic Ney</p>
<p>Amazing . You&#8217;re the leader.</p>
<p>Keep up good work</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Television Archiving &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-08-28</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-93774</link>
		<dc:creator>Television Archiving &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-08-28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-93774</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Is Web Video Ready for an HD Upgrade? « NewTeeVee Interesting numbers on delivery costs. (tags: hd cdn dsl contentdeliverynetworks video internet) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Web Video Ready for an HD Upgrade? « NewTeeVee Interesting numbers on delivery costs. (tags: hd cdn dsl contentdeliverynetworks video internet) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ney</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-90311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-90311</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;True HD 720p in Full-screen&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;requires the Flash Player 9 Update 3 Beta player from:
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS: Look at the quality and playback comparing to all other DEMOs using the Beta Flash Player. And the SUPER is only 60% quality of the orignal file.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ney&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True HD 720p in Full-screen</p>
<p><a href="http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen" rel="nofollow">http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_FullScreen</a></p>
<p>requires the Flash Player 9 Update 3 Beta player from:<br />
<a href="http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html" rel="nofollow">http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html</a></p>
<p>PS: Look at the quality and playback comparing to all other DEMOs using the Beta Flash Player. And the SUPER is only 60% quality of the orignal file.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Ney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ney</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-84469</link>
		<dc:creator>Ney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 04:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-84469</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have discover/created the best HD video online today... Check it out for yourself:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;960x540p
http://www.interactivedna.com/HD&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1280x720p
http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_720p/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS: To watch HD video you must have a decent pc/mac with broadband connection.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So far all the feedbacks are amazing like. How about yours? let me know what  you think!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ney Vasconcelos
ney@interactiveDNA.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,</p>
<p>I have discover/created the best HD video online today&#8230; Check it out for yourself:</p>
<p>960&#215;540p<br />
<a href="http://www.interactivedna.com/HD" rel="nofollow">http://www.interactivedna.com/HD</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p>1280&#215;720p<br />
<a href="http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_720p/" rel="nofollow">http://www.interactivedna.com/HD_720p/</a></p>
<p>PS: To watch HD video you must have a decent pc/mac with broadband connection.</p>
<p>So far all the feedbacks are amazing like. How about yours? let me know what  you think!</p>
<p>Ney Vasconcelos<br />
<a href="mailto:ney@interactiveDNA.com">ney@interactiveDNA.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewTeeVee Survey Says: Poor Video Quality Drives Watchers Away &#171;</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-69558</link>
		<dc:creator>NewTeeVee Survey Says: Poor Video Quality Drives Watchers Away &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-69558</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] That finding is out of line with the commonly accepted wisdom at NewTeeVee that people prefer availability of content to quality of content &#8212; a conclusion drawn from the enormous popularity of YouTube and P2P file-sharing. However, many, like our fearless leader Om, are eagerly awaiting the day when video quality gets &#8220;an HD upgrade,&#8221; as he called it last week. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That finding is out of line with the commonly accepted wisdom at NewTeeVee that people prefer availability of content to quality of content &#8212; a conclusion drawn from the enormous popularity of YouTube and P2P file-sharing. However, many, like our fearless leader Om, are eagerly awaiting the day when video quality gets &#8220;an HD upgrade,&#8221; as he called it last week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvin</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-61360</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-61360</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Comparativley I&#039;m pretty impressed with what DivX has done with Stage6.com. Quality wise it far excels passed YouTube, it has solid content and could serve as a good platform. Granted it has a few bugs, but for qualities sake, its HD streaming is right up there.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparativley I&#8217;m pretty impressed with what DivX has done with Stage6.com. Quality wise it far excels passed YouTube, it has solid content and could serve as a good platform. Granted it has a few bugs, but for qualities sake, its HD streaming is right up there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-60853</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-60853</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too was wondering where HotSwap&#039;s &quot;technology&quot; is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems that P2P CDNs don&#039;t support Flash (or Flash doesn&#039;t support them, whatever), so this may be a roadbump on the way to bandwidth nirvana.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was wondering where HotSwap&#8217;s &#8220;technology&#8221; is.</p>
<p>It seems that P2P CDNs don&#8217;t support Flash (or Flash doesn&#8217;t support them, whatever), so this may be a roadbump on the way to bandwidth nirvana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-60635</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/07/30/is-web-video-ready-for-an-hd-upgrade/#comment-60635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The &quot;start-up called HotSwap&quot; uses DivX, so what&#039;s the point?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;start-up called HotSwap&#8221; uses DivX, so what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
