<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey Says: Poor Video Quality Drives Watchers Away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Bubble May Soon Burst for Digital Content Company Valuations</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-233056</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Bubble May Soon Burst for Digital Content Company Valuations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-233056</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] lawsuit against YouTube, and also seemed to coincide with growing dissatisfaction with the poor quality of most online video content. Sony&#8217;s move may soon be considered to have been a shrewd one. YouTube certainly had all the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lawsuit against YouTube, and also seemed to coincide with growing dissatisfaction with the poor quality of most online video content. Sony&#8217;s move may soon be considered to have been a shrewd one. YouTube certainly had all the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: User Generated Video: It Is Big &#38; Crisp In Japan &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-113432</link>
		<dc:creator>User Generated Video: It Is Big &#38; Crisp In Japan &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-113432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] may say the same about US-based video sharing sites in the US. YouTube has all the traffic, but the video quality is not anything to write home [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may say the same about US-based video sharing sites in the US. YouTube has all the traffic, but the video quality is not anything to write home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kfir Pravda</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-73624</link>
		<dc:creator>Kfir Pravda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-73624</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve did a piece yesterday about Stage6. If video quality was the most inportant factor, Stage6 that offers much better video quality, was a huge success. As you can see in our post - they are not ...
http://pravdam.com/2007/08/08/guest-writer-guy-nesher-what-went-wrong-with-stage6/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve did a piece yesterday about Stage6. If video quality was the most inportant factor, Stage6 that offers much better video quality, was a huge success. As you can see in our post &#8211; they are not &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://pravdam.com/2007/08/08/guest-writer-guy-nesher-what-went-wrong-with-stage6/" rel="nofollow">http://pravdam.com/2007/08/08/guest-writer-guy-nesher-what-went-wrong-with-stage6/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small World News &#187; New Video On Net Studies&#8230;Quality not Gadgetry</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-71572</link>
		<dc:creator>Small World News &#187; New Video On Net Studies&#8230;Quality not Gadgetry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-71572</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] few days ago NewTeevee blogged about this interesting study commissioned by Akamai. It found that one of the biggest headaches for viewers of video on the web are the inexorable [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago NewTeevee blogged about this interesting study commissioned by Akamai. It found that one of the biggest headaches for viewers of video on the web are the inexorable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69949</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69949</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mark,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So colorful in your description. Love it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>So colorful in your description. Love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Iliya Krempeaux</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69701</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Iliya Krempeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69701</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s my (perhaps subjective) assessment that poor audio quality is much much worse than poor video quality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People seem to be more forgiving of less than perfect video than they are of audio.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux
    http://changelog.ca/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my (perhaps subjective) assessment that poor audio quality is much much worse than poor video quality.</p>
<p>People seem to be more forgiving of less than perfect video than they are of audio.</p>
<p>&#8211; Charles Iliya Krempeaux<br />
    <a href="http://changelog.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://changelog.ca/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark day</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69650</link>
		<dc:creator>mark day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69650</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did the survey note how much dissatisfaction was created by poor video quality of &quot;free&quot; online porn content?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because that probably screwed the pooch... I mean skewed the results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just sayin&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the survey note how much dissatisfaction was created by poor video quality of &#8220;free&#8221; online porn content?</p>
<p>Because that probably screwed the pooch&#8230; I mean skewed the results.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Sinton</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69588</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Sinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/07/video-quality/#comment-69588</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is already a ton of HD content that is available for download out there.  Here is just a small sampling:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.mefeedia.com/lists/81/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These are all available for download into Miro (preferred) or iTunes, making it viewable for offline as well as online viewing and even available for viewing on the TV. :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is that a lot of the 1st generation video sites are still caught up with the ease of Flash video. The 2nd generation online video networks - such as Mefeedia :-) - bring together quality content and make it available openly to enjoy WHENEVER and WHEREVER you want.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already a ton of HD content that is available for download out there.  Here is just a small sampling:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mefeedia.com/lists/81/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mefeedia.com/lists/81/</a></p>
<p>These are all available for download into Miro (preferred) or iTunes, making it viewable for offline as well as online viewing and even available for viewing on the TV. :)</p>
<p>The problem is that a lot of the 1st generation video sites are still caught up with the ease of Flash video. The 2nd generation online video networks &#8211; such as Mefeedia :-) &#8211; bring together quality content and make it available openly to enjoy WHENEVER and WHEREVER you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
