<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video Downloads&#8230; Suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/08/10/video-downloads-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/10/video-downloads-suck/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chynna Mai</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/10/video-downloads-suck/#comment-72506</link>
		<dc:creator>Chynna Mai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/10/video-downloads-suck/#comment-72506</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting study.. Just as Barrett says in the study, I do find that &quot;niche&quot; video download companies, such as mine, are somewhat immune to this particular issue. Though certainly not completely. 
  My site launched in 2001 and our downloads sold consistently at $9.99 shortly after that. However, since the recent boom in video downloads and the low price they have come at, we have reduced our price 50% to stay competitive.. yet we never experienced a reduction of sales.
  Perhaps it&#039;s not that video downloads suck. Perhaps they aren&#039;t as appealing in comparison to alternatives that are generally just as easy to acquire. Perhaps it&#039;s on over-saturation of product (mainstream) offered. (90% of my site&#039;s content is also available on DVD, but it&#039;s very niche.) Or.. perhaps they suck and it will drive mainstream 
video download companies into striving for a better product that will appeal to the consumer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting study.. Just as Barrett says in the study, I do find that &#8220;niche&#8221; video download companies, such as mine, are somewhat immune to this particular issue. Though certainly not completely.<br />
  My site launched in 2001 and our downloads sold consistently at $9.99 shortly after that. However, since the recent boom in video downloads and the low price they have come at, we have reduced our price 50% to stay competitive.. yet we never experienced a reduction of sales.<br />
  Perhaps it&#8217;s not that video downloads suck. Perhaps they aren&#8217;t as appealing in comparison to alternatives that are generally just as easy to acquire. Perhaps it&#8217;s on over-saturation of product (mainstream) offered. (90% of my site&#8217;s content is also available on DVD, but it&#8217;s very niche.) Or.. perhaps they suck and it will drive mainstream<br />
video download companies into striving for a better product that will appeal to the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movie Downloads: The Pros and Cons - Movie reviews - Spout</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/10/video-downloads-suck/#comment-72433</link>
		<dc:creator>Movie Downloads: The Pros and Cons - Movie reviews - Spout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/10/video-downloads-suck/#comment-72433</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] movie download site Movielink might want to wait before opening that bottle of champers. In a blog post titled “Video Downloads … Suck,” Om Malik*** points to a study by Parks Associates, which was [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] movie download site Movielink might want to wait before opening that bottle of champers. In a blog post titled “Video Downloads … Suck,” Om Malik*** points to a study by Parks Associates, which was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
