<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Launches Virtual Drive, Calls It PVR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:56:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DVR Bulletin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ad Skipping or Fast Forwarding?</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-94575</link>
		<dc:creator>DVR Bulletin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ad Skipping or Fast Forwarding?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-94575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] [Via TV Squad. Business 2.0 and NewTeeVee.] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Via TV Squad. Business 2.0 and NewTeeVee.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Kumar</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-78236</link>
		<dc:creator>K Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-78236</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re quite right. Start-over isn&#039;t PVR, whatever the marketing guys call it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What it is, is popular!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look-back is even more interesting, since now you don&#039;t even have to make it to your TV within the show&#039;s scheduled hour! You just have to make it to the TV SOMETIME during the day! Cool!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;KK&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re quite right. Start-over isn&#8217;t PVR, whatever the marketing guys call it.</p>
<p>What it is, is popular!</p>
<p>Look-back is even more interesting, since now you don&#8217;t even have to make it to your TV within the show&#8217;s scheduled hour! You just have to make it to the TV SOMETIME during the day! Cool!</p>
<p>KK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A PVR for dodos &#171; The World According To Carp</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-78030</link>
		<dc:creator>A PVR for dodos &#171; The World According To Carp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-78030</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Malik compares TWC with a dodo. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malik compares TWC with a dodo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77790</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77790</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Kumar,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;just wondering does Start Over qualify as a PVR. To me it doesn&#039;t/ Regardless, your point is well taken.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the issue of virtual drive, well what I mean is what kind of a PVR is it if you can skip or forward video. It is just virtual storage of video with playback functionality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was going with sarcasm with the &quot;Virtual Drive&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kumar,</p>
<p>just wondering does Start Over qualify as a PVR. To me it doesn&#8217;t/ Regardless, your point is well taken.</p>
<p>On the issue of virtual drive, well what I mean is what kind of a PVR is it if you can skip or forward video. It is just virtual storage of video with playback functionality.</p>
<p>I was going with sarcasm with the &#8220;Virtual Drive&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvjunkie</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77594</link>
		<dc:creator>tvjunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77594</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cable&#039;s actually been doing some pretty cool stuff for a long time - they&#039;re probably slower than I&#039;d like to do some of the things they&#039;re doing, but hey, have the satellite guys been any better? And I don&#039;t see the phone guys doing anything major with that service yet!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vyyo, TellyTopia, TVGuide - they&#039;re some of the cooler startups in the Cable space that&#039;re helping the cable guy get into the internet age.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hey, when Mark Cuban starts saying that the Internet is dead and Cable has the ability to be the saviour - we gotta think!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://hd.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=165851&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Mark Cuban episode shows cable&#039;s got potential. Will they realise it? Donno. I sure hope they do. Check out this open letter from the previous poster:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6467903.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable&#8217;s actually been doing some pretty cool stuff for a long time &#8211; they&#8217;re probably slower than I&#8217;d like to do some of the things they&#8217;re doing, but hey, have the satellite guys been any better? And I don&#8217;t see the phone guys doing anything major with that service yet!</p>
<p>Vyyo, TellyTopia, TVGuide &#8211; they&#8217;re some of the cooler startups in the Cable space that&#8217;re helping the cable guy get into the internet age.</p>
<p>Hey, when Mark Cuban starts saying that the Internet is dead and Cable has the ability to be the saviour &#8211; we gotta think!</p>
<p><a href="http://hd.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=165851" rel="nofollow">http://hd.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=165851</a></p>
<p>The Mark Cuban episode shows cable&#8217;s got potential. Will they realise it? Donno. I sure hope they do. Check out this open letter from the previous poster:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6467903.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6467903.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Kumar</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77475</link>
		<dc:creator>K Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77475</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Cable TV industry is watching TWC&#039;s &quot;Start-over&quot; and &quot;Look-back&quot; initiatives closely. The early consensus seems to be that the viewers like it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Start-over is for people who get home at 6:10PM and want to watch the 6:00PM news from the start - one click and you can watch it from the beginning. The viewer doesn&#039;t know that it&#039;s VOD behind the scenes, of course - it doesn&#039;t need a VOD menu to access.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look-back is more ambitious and lets you see more things that aired that same day, I believe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe Start-over is free, not sure about Look-back. Where did you see the &quot;virtual drive&quot; feature? Could you please share more about that?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Time Warner is doing things incrementally, and their consumers like it. From talking to several TWC people, a very large percentage of people in South Carolina were using start-over - much higher than were using VOD...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>
<p>The Cable TV industry is watching TWC&#8217;s &#8220;Start-over&#8221; and &#8220;Look-back&#8221; initiatives closely. The early consensus seems to be that the viewers like it.</p>
<p>Start-over is for people who get home at 6:10PM and want to watch the 6:00PM news from the start &#8211; one click and you can watch it from the beginning. The viewer doesn&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s VOD behind the scenes, of course &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t need a VOD menu to access.</p>
<p>Look-back is more ambitious and lets you see more things that aired that same day, I believe.</p>
<p>I believe Start-over is free, not sure about Look-back. Where did you see the &#8220;virtual drive&#8221; feature? Could you please share more about that?</p>
<p>Time Warner is doing things incrementally, and their consumers like it. From talking to several TWC people, a very large percentage of people in South Carolina were using start-over &#8211; much higher than were using VOD&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77245</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hey andre,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;you sure that is the case. isn&#039;t that more like a VoD - video on demand service that lets you forward and rewind stuff. I have not lived in new york for about 5 years so might not know.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey andre,</p>
<p>you sure that is the case. isn&#8217;t that more like a VoD &#8211; video on demand service that lets you forward and rewind stuff. I have not lived in new york for about 5 years so might not know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77208</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/08/14/time-warner-launches-virtual-drive-calls-it-pvr/#comment-77208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here in NYC I pay $9/month for Time Warner Cable&#039;s &quot;DVR&quot; service.  It does not have the cripples you reference here.  I was under the impression that this new &quot;PVR&quot; functionality was going to be added for free to the standard cable box.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s a step up from the current cable box that doesn&#039;t have any DVR-type functionality, even with the limitations on commercial fast forwarding...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in NYC I pay $9/month for Time Warner Cable&#8217;s &#8220;DVR&#8221; service.  It does not have the cripples you reference here.  I was under the impression that this new &#8220;PVR&#8221; functionality was going to be added for free to the standard cable box.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a step up from the current cable box that doesn&#8217;t have any DVR-type functionality, even with the limitations on commercial fast forwarding&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
