Comments on: Will Your Future iPod Store 30,000 Movies? http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/ NewTeeVee Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:46:17 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: trademark registration http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-190659 trademark registration Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:52:28 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-190659 <p>Wow. This sounds amazing. Being able to store 1s and 0s on atoms would be one of the most profound advancements in technology ever.</p> Wow. This sounds amazing. Being able to store 1s and 0s on atoms would be one of the most profound advancements in technology ever.

]]> By: Liz Gannes http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-96017 Liz Gannes Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:01:20 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-96017 <p>Thanks Marshall!</p> Thanks Marshall!

]]> By: Marshall Kirkpatrick http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-95918 Marshall Kirkpatrick Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:14:08 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-95918 <p>Funny, I was just reading a much dumber account of this story over at, believe it or not, the British Computer Society. Some genius writer over there says the story is that "YouTube could fit on single atom!" And that "structures built from clusters of atoms could hold up to 30,000 movies, equivalent to the entire content on YouTube." Imagine that, structures built from clusters of atoms! To think that the current method of storage at YouTube (cotton candy? made without atoms?) isn't the ultimate method!</p> <p>Maybe I'm missing something in that write up, but NewTeeVee seems like a much more intelligent source to me! :)</p> Funny, I was just reading a much dumber account of this story over at, believe it or not, the British Computer Society. Some genius writer over there says the story is that “YouTube could fit on single atom!” And that “structures built from clusters of atoms could hold up to 30,000 movies, equivalent to the entire content on YouTube.” Imagine that, structures built from clusters of atoms! To think that the current method of storage at YouTube (cotton candy? made without atoms?) isn’t the ultimate method!

Maybe I’m missing something in that write up, but NewTeeVee seems like a much more intelligent source to me! :)

]]> By: The Muso http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-95793 The Muso Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:39:14 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-95793 <p>Or I suppose, the notion that storgae will become truly separate from the device (plug and play).</p> Or I suppose, the notion that storgae will become truly separate from the device (plug and play).

]]> By: The Muso http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-95792 The Muso Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:38:16 +0000 http://newteevee.com/2007/08/31/will-your-future-ipod-store-30000-movies/#comment-95792 <p>The result of this and other storage advances is that capacity becomes completely commoditised. Any device will be able to store more than you need and so comparison will be obsolete. The focus then moves to competition on other feature sets, particularly for me, the seamlessness with which data can be synchonised across devices.</p> The result of this and other storage advances is that capacity becomes completely commoditised. Any device will be able to store more than you need and so comparison will be obsolete. The focus then moves to competition on other feature sets, particularly for me, the seamlessness with which data can be synchonised across devices.

]]>