<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should YouTube Open its Video ID Index?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Le notizie del 19.10.07 &#124; tommaso.tessarolo</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125991</link>
		<dc:creator>Le notizie del 19.10.07 &#124; tommaso.tessarolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125991</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] YOUTUBE APRI IL TUO INDICE! [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YOUTUBE APRI IL TUO INDICE! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetTV: le news del 19.10.07 &#124; N3TV</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125763</link>
		<dc:creator>NetTV: le news del 19.10.07 &#124; N3TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125763</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] YOUTUBE APRI IL TUO INDICE! [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YOUTUBE APRI IL TUO INDICE! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coalition to Counter Google on Video Copyright &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125686</link>
		<dc:creator>Coalition to Counter Google on Video Copyright &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125686</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] had written earlier this week that Google faces a significant challenge in getting copyright holders to add [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had written earlier this week that Google faces a significant challenge in getting copyright holders to add [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wilde</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125240</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/10/16/should-youtube-open-its-video-id-index/#comment-125240</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Liz:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this is a terrific idea.  Google&#039;s announcement still places too much burden on the copyright holder, who now has to provide all of their content to Google for this to work.  The major media companies are unlikely to be willing to ship their content over to Google for this purpose.  A better approach is as you suggest-provide a more robust access to the collection and better rules of engagement for determining infringement and takedown/staydown.  Failure to take this step still seems to leave Google vulnerable to ultimately losing the DMCA safe harbor they believe they are operating under, until the courts decide otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz:</p>
<p>I think this is a terrific idea.  Google&#8217;s announcement still places too much burden on the copyright holder, who now has to provide all of their content to Google for this to work.  The major media companies are unlikely to be willing to ship their content over to Google for this purpose.  A better approach is as you suggest-provide a more robust access to the collection and better rules of engagement for determining infringement and takedown/staydown.  Failure to take this step still seems to leave Google vulnerable to ultimately losing the DMCA safe harbor they believe they are operating under, until the courts decide otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
