Written by Chris Albrecht
Posted Friday, October 19, 2007 at 10:21 AM PT

 

Comcast Does Indeed Block BitTorrent

Though Comcast has denied it in the past, a new nationwide test conducted by the Associated Press shows that the cable giant is indeed actively interfering with file sharing through services like BitTorrent, eDonkey and Gnutella.

The AP’s tests showed that Comcast (CMCSA) is not hindering the downloading of BitTorrent files, but the company does block or delay uploads. The problem being that with the peer-to-peer nature of BitTorrent’s technology, uploads and downloads are interchangeable. When files are being exchanged between two computers, Comcast surreptitiously steps in and gets the two machines to hang up on each other.

A Comcast spokesperson told the AP:

“Comcast does not block access to any applications, including BitTorrent.” - Comcast spokesperson Charlie Douglas

When pressed, Douglas would not define what he meant by “access.”

Comcast’s actions are re-igniting the debate about net neutrality, as its practices are indiscriminate when it comes to the type of content being shared online. An independent producer distributing his own film, for example, is treated with the same regard as a pirate trading illegal copies of movies.

For its part, Comcast says it has a right to manage its network in order to ensure that a small portion of file sharers are not affecting the bandwidth of other customers. Other ISPs engage in so-called “traffic-shaping,” which slows down some types of traffic. But Comcast is targeting one type of traffic.

Comcast’s reputation suffered another blow, literally, when 75-year-old Mona Shaw took a hammer to her local Comcast customer service office and started smashing up the joint. She was upset, to say the least, when Comcast missed an installation date and basically treated her like a BitTorrent file.

 

« Previous Post Next Post »

Comments & Trackbacks

  1. Hmmm,

    That may explain why my Allpeers wasn’t working properly. Some of us use p2p to transfer files to and from clients.

    Lawrence on October 19th, 2007 at 11:44 am - Permalink
  2. What people really need is a P2P wireless hardware solution which would liberate them from their ISP completely.

    If each home had such a device, and transmission power was kept low enough, you could create a network which excludes the ISP completely making them obselete.

    Wise one on October 19th, 2007 at 12:12 pm - Permalink
  3. and I am paying for this…sheeesh….

    Lance Newell on October 19th, 2007 at 12:21 pm - Permalink
  4. Can’t blame Comcast for protecting the bandwidth and experience of the others when a P2P session slows the others down on the network.

    A Cable network is shared, of course, in the last mile.

    And a P2P network is built to capture all the bandwidth that is available (upstream AND downstream). So, when our neighbour starts downloading video via P2P - usually pirated, mind you - he is being selfish in capturing all available bandwidth. The effect on all others surfing is to slow them all down.

    Do we blame Comcast for slowing down the biggest users so we get our access normally? Does that hamper net-neutrality?

    I think not. Not as long as the P2P users are not unduly distressed, and us others are able to get the service we’re paying for.

    K Kumar on October 20th, 2007 at 12:12 am - Permalink
  5. K Kumar:
    I strongly disagree. They’re not just throttling the traffic, they are forging TCP packets with the RST-flag enabled, causing connections to drop. And I’d say interfering with a specific protocol, in this case BitTorrent, is an obvious violation of net neutrality. If Comcast has a problem with the bandwidth, they should rather set a fixed limit instead of advertising their service as unlimited.

    If my ISP did anything like this, I would certainly find a new provider immediately. Luckily, pretty much none of the ISPs here in Norway throttle any kind of traffic, or impose limits on the amount of data you can transfer during a month.

    Right now I’m on a simple 6.5 Mbps ADSL-connection. But fiber-to-the-home recently became available in my area, and I’m considering getting a 50 Mbps connection. But that is only going to happen if the ISP doesn’t interfere with my BitTorrent- or Usenet-traffic.

    Torgrim on October 20th, 2007 at 2:13 pm - Permalink
  6. One solution for P2P developers just move to a UDP system I cant wait for the hilarity to ensue when Concast tries to block P2P based video like Joost .

    Matt_ on October 21st, 2007 at 10:00 am - Permalink
  7. [...] control what happens on their networks, and have been testing their boundaries lately. Outcry over Comcast interfering with BitTorrent file transfers, AT&T restricting user criticism, and Verizon Wireless blocking text messages drew the [...]

    Senators Want Hearing on BitTorrent Blocking « NewTeeVee on October 26th, 2007 at 2:57 pm - Permalink
  8. [...] Comcast, Oprah, Revver Comcast Still Denying it Blocks P2P; despite being busted and coming under attack from consumer groups, the cable company has released a statement saying it [...]

    Vid-Biz: Comcast, Oprah, Revver « NewTeeVee on November 2nd, 2007 at 10:09 am - Permalink
  9. [...] also at CES, FCC Chair Kevin Martin confirmed that his commission will investigate Comcast blocking BitTorrent traffic (Comcast says it just delays the [...]

    AT&T Mulls Monitoring Your Traffic « NewTeeVee on January 9th, 2008 at 9:39 am - Permalink
  10. [...] openly talked about technological solutions to piracy, and Comcast, which is being investigated for blocking BitTorrent traffic, Verizon is going its own way on this [...]

    Verizon to Hollywood: I Said, “No, no, no!” « NewTeeVee on February 6th, 2008 at 10:57 am - Permalink
  11. [...] Comcast, which underwent heavy criticism last year for blocking file-sharing services like BitTorrent, has reportedly been caught quietly changing its Terms of Service. Although Comcast has denied that [...]

    Road Runner, Charter and Cox TOS Also Include Anti-P2P Provisions « NewTeeVee on February 10th, 2008 at 12:00 am - Permalink
  12. [...] Bill Reignites Net Neutrality Debate With Comcast blocking BitTorrent (and staunchly defending its right to do so today), AT&T’s ideas about monitoring your [...]

    New Bill Reignites Net Neutrality Debate « NewTeeVee on February 13th, 2008 at 9:31 am - Permalink
  13. [...] about the depths to which Comcast currently tracks my every move. I can’t trust Comcast with BitTorrent, so why should I trust them with my must-be-kept-secret, DVR-clogging addiction to Keeping Up with [...]

    Comcast Cameras to Start Watching You? « NewTeeVee on March 18th, 2008 at 11:42 am - Permalink
  14. [...] already do that)?Others have already pointed out that we already can’t trust Comcast with BitTorrent or to play nice with others. So why would I trust Comcast to put a camera in my freaking [...]

    Daily WTF: Comcast wants to watch you watch TV « This Just In on March 19th, 2008 at 10:11 pm - Permalink
  15. [...] naive about the depths to which Comcast currently tracks my every move. I can’t trust Comcast with BitTorrent, so why should I trust them with my must-be-kept-secret, DVR-clogging addiction to Keeping Up with [...]

    Information Comcast Cameras to Start Watching You? - DN For United Mankind Forum on March 22nd, 2008 at 11:28 pm - Permalink
  16. [...] left me dazed and confused. It was basically a roundabout way for the cable company to backtrack from its P2P traffic-blocking gaffe. In describing the deal, Comcast tried to shift the focus away from their so-called “network [...]

    Comcast Cable CTO: Bandwidth Hogs Will Experience Slowdowns - GigaOM on March 31st, 2008 at 8:24 am - Permalink
  17. [...] about the depths to which Comcast currently tracks my every move. I can’t trust Comcast with BitTorrent, so why should I trust them with my must-be-kept-secret, DVR-clogging addiction to Keeping Up with [...]

    Comcast Cameras to Start Watching You? | Alternative News Sources on May 2nd, 2008 at 7:02 pm - Permalink

Leave a reply








Safari hates me

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it may have gotten caught in our trusty (but occasionally overly ambitious) spam filter. Please drop us a note and we'll retrieve it.