Written by Chris Albrecht
Posted Friday, November 9, 2007 at 5:00 AM PT

 

So Just Shill… to the Next Episode

The latest episode of MySpace’s original jigglefest series Roommates is so blatant with its product placement that I don’t know whether to to be ashamed, or stand up and applaud its bald-faced lack of pretense, throwing away any semblance of art.

This episode isn’t a show, it’s a commercial. A bad commercial.



Add to My Profile | More Videos

Two of the girls take a trip to the (sponsor) Ford dealership, where the aspiring actress explains to the salesman that price matters, and since she has to drive to auditions, gas mileage does too. She, of course, needs to “upgrade” to a Focus, which she learns during a test drive, the car features a “fully integrated, voice activated, in-car communication entertainment system for your phone and digital media player.”

We’ve talked before about what role product placement should play in web video, and how web video is turning into a shill game. But this makes the massive product placement in Kate Modern look like PBS.

I’m no hippie. I get and appreciate commerce. Independent producers want to make web shows, but have no money. Brands have lots of money and want to connect with today’s hip, young audiences. Today’s hip audiences hate pre-roll ads, so advertisers must find other ways to get their message out. Which brings us back to the independent producer who will gladly take the brand’s money.

With the writer’s strike happening, many expect that now is the big chance for web video to catch on and find audiences. But potential viewers are going to be alienated unless product placement a little more elegant.

(And no, the irony of my re-stating Ford’s talking points in this post is not lost on me. But it did not pay for this message.)

Follow us on Twitter or subscribe to the feed

Sphere
Topic: Money & Power

Comments (6)

  • Hey, you gotta start somewhere.

    There aren’t a lot of people doing integrated advertising in online video yet and it’s going to take some time for people to figure out how to do it right without taking viewers out of the story.

    The real tough part will be convincing the advertiser that you need to have conflict in the scene in order to build interest. The marketers that I’ve come across want everything to be “great” just like it is in the above video.

    Tim Street8:55 AM on November 9, 2007 Reply

  • The greater offense, to my thinking, is how bad the show itself is.

    That said, I totally second Mr. Street’s excellent comments. If the episode had had two extra scenes, if it hadn’t been just a product placement, it would’ve seemed less egregious.

    Brian Hogg10:15 AM on November 9, 2007 Reply

  • i feel bad just watching it.

    zoso11:31 AM on November 9, 2007 Reply

  • chris – hilarious yet astute observations here. cheers, milo

    p.s. and if the video had had extra scenes, they probably would have included bikinis!

    milowet11:49 AM on November 9, 2007 Reply

  • Believe it or not, I don’t have much of a problem with this…it seems that all online video is going to end up with ads so why not make the ads entertaining (or at least try to…)

    This is no different than Ford’s American Idol “music videos” that they’ve done for a few years.

    Instead of bashing Ford/Myspace we should be commending them for forward thinking.

    Brian Andrews3:08 PM on November 9, 2007 Reply

  • The difference between that show and a real commercial?

    Real commercials have better acting. :p

    Blogwatcher — 4:38 PM on November 9, 2007 Reply

Linkbacks (0)

Subscribe to comments feed

Leave a Reply

Sign up for our daily email: