<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Steve Said: &#8220;HD&#8221; vs. &#8220;High Quality&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Finalmente em Alta Definição (720p) &#171; Azougado&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-251791</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Finalmente em Alta Definição (720p) &#171; Azougado&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-251791</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conte&#250;do HD no YouTube &#124; bernabauer.com</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250819</link>
		<dc:creator>Conte&#250;do HD no YouTube &#124; bernabauer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250819</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] ser HD, o v&#237;deo em si parece n&#227;o ser HD ao p&#233; da letra. Ele &#233; consideravelmente melhor do que o High-Quality, mas n&#227;o &#233; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ser HD, o v&iacute;deo em si parece n&atilde;o ser HD ao p&eacute; da letra. Ele &eacute; consideravelmente melhor do que o High-Quality, mas n&atilde;o &eacute; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Goes HD Gains Viewers But Loses in Market &#124; Driven To Nvizion Life</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250757</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Goes HD Gains Viewers But Loses in Market &#124; Driven To Nvizion Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250757</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] talk about going HD has been going on just about forever with YouTube and there were even some workarounds possible. Now users don&#8217;t have to add or do [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talk about going HD has been going on just about forever with YouTube and there were even some workarounds possible. Now users don&#8217;t have to add or do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Finalmente em Alta Defini&#231;&#227;o (720p) &#171; Casa Tuga</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250529</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Finalmente em Alta Defini&#231;&#227;o (720p) &#171; Casa Tuga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250529</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] estarão realmente dentro de padrões da Alta Definição (720p/1080i), que caso lhe interesse pode ler mais aqui, não há dúvida, que o conteúdo em AD tem uma qualidade de imagem extremamente superior, sendo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube diventa HD (più o meno) - Gizmodo IT - Il gadget weblog</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250517</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube diventa HD (più o meno) - Gizmodo IT - Il gadget weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250517</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] o no lo standard minimo dell&#8217;HD di 720p/1080i, e potete leggere l&#8217;intera controversia a questo indirizzo, se vi interessa approfondire la questione. Ma non c&#8217;è alcun dubbio che i contenuti di [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o no lo standard minimo dell&#8217;HD di 720p/1080i, e potete leggere l&#8217;intera controversia a questo indirizzo, se vi interessa approfondire la questione. Ma non c&#8217;è alcun dubbio che i contenuti di [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube devient &#8220;HD&#8221; - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250515</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube devient &#8220;HD&#8221; - Gizmodo - Tant d'amour pour ces fabuleux nouveaux gadgets, c'est surnaturel.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250515</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] si la norme minimale 720p/1080i HD était respectée, et vous pouvez lire toute la controverse ici si c&#8217;est votre tasse de thé. Mais il n&#8217;y a aucun doute sur le fait que le contenu [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] si la norme minimale 720p/1080i HD était respectée, et vous pouvez lire toute la controverse ici si c&#8217;est votre tasse de thé. Mais il n&#8217;y a aucun doute sur le fait que le contenu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Youtube Goes HD &#171; Daily News2Read 2.0</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250509</link>
		<dc:creator>Youtube Goes HD &#171; Daily News2Read 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-250509</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] meets the minimum 720p/1080i HD standard, and you can read more about that whole controversy here if that&#8217;s your sort of thing, but there&#8217;s no doubt that YouTube &#8220;HD&#8221; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meets the minimum 720p/1080i HD standard, and you can read more about that whole controversy here if that&#8217;s your sort of thing, but there&#8217;s no doubt that YouTube &#8220;HD&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Goes Widescreen &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-249787</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube Goes Widescreen &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-249787</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 4:3). Seems like the site is upgrading from its accessibility-trumps-quality mantra (and no doubt hearing the drumbeat of demand for high-definition [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4:3). Seems like the site is upgrading from its accessibility-trumps-quality mantra (and no doubt hearing the drumbeat of demand for high-definition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cineteq</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-234622</link>
		<dc:creator>cineteq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-234622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s great that YouTube has improved the quality, but you need to consider few things before encoding for higher quality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Youtube Hi Def
http://www.squidoo.com/youtubehd&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great that YouTube has improved the quality, but you need to consider few things before encoding for higher quality.</p>
<p>Youtube Hi Def<br />
<a href="http://www.squidoo.com/youtubehd" rel="nofollow">http://www.squidoo.com/youtubehd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube&#8217;s Bumps Up Streaming Quality &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-233804</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube&#8217;s Bumps Up Streaming Quality &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-233804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Chen told us at NewTeeVee Live last year that YouTube would experiment with different quality streams, depending on the user&#8217;s bandwidth. Perhaps this is the new &#8220;good enough&#8221; for [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chen told us at NewTeeVee Live last year that YouTube would experiment with different quality streams, depending on the user&#8217;s bandwidth. Perhaps this is the new &#8220;good enough&#8221; for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viimeisellä Rannalla &#187; Tubella leikkaa</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-231592</link>
		<dc:creator>Viimeisellä Rannalla &#187; Tubella leikkaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-231592</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] kaavailtiin myös muita jakeluteitä videoille, ovathan ne nyt saatavilla jo [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kaavailtiin myös muita jakeluteitä videoille, ovathan ne nyt saatavilla jo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The return of &#8220;Top English WP Blogs&#8221; &#171; conduong.co.cc</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-198853</link>
		<dc:creator>The return of &#8220;Top English WP Blogs&#8221; &#171; conduong.co.cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-198853</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] What Steve Said: &#8220;HD&#8221; vs. &#8220;High Quality&#8221; At NewTeeVee Live last week, Om and I asked YouTube co-founder and CTO Steve Chen whether or not YouTube had plans to [&#8230;] [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Steve Said: &#8220;HD&#8221; vs. &#8220;High Quality&#8221; At NewTeeVee Live last week, Om and I asked YouTube co-founder and CTO Steve Chen whether or not YouTube had plans to [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-175103</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-175103</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;HD!  HD!  (I&#039;m not only a content creator, but I&#039;m a viewer too... And I&#039;m still hoping they&#039;ll improve the viewing experience).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HD!  HD!  (I&#8217;m not only a content creator, but I&#8217;m a viewer too&#8230; And I&#8217;m still hoping they&#8217;ll improve the viewing experience).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does HD On a PC Screen Matter? - META Blog -</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-165310</link>
		<dc:creator>Does HD On a PC Screen Matter? - META Blog -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-165310</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] to our questions about video quality by saying that YouTube will boost the quality of the videos, but not at the expense of user experience. Buffering and video playback delays were an anathema to the popular destination site, and YouTube [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to our questions about video quality by saying that YouTube will boost the quality of the videos, but not at the expense of user experience. Buffering and video playback delays were an anathema to the popular destination site, and YouTube [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does HD On A PC Screen Matter? &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-163974</link>
		<dc:creator>Does HD On A PC Screen Matter? &#171; GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-163974</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] to our questions about video quality by saying that YouTube will boost quality of the videos, but not at the expense of user experience. Buffering and video playback delays were an anathema to the popular destination site, and YouTube [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to our questions about video quality by saying that YouTube will boost quality of the videos, but not at the expense of user experience. Buffering and video playback delays were an anathema to the popular destination site, and YouTube [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lynn</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-163066</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/19/what-steve-said-hd-vs-high-quality/#comment-163066</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did anyone ask him about DivX&#039;s Stage6 site?  It seems to stream faster than YouTube with a higher-quality picture.  I wonder why people don&#039;t flock to it...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone ask him about DivX&#8217;s Stage6 site?  It seems to stream faster than YouTube with a higher-quality picture.  I wonder why people don&#8217;t flock to it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
