<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dreaming of a Google Set-Top Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Motorola: No Google Android Powered Set-top Box [GigaOM] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-259220</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorola: No Google Android Powered Set-top Box [GigaOM] &#124; BYOHosting.com Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-259220</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the multi-featured set-top box that can play back DVDs and CDs would use Google&#8217;s Android OS. I had heard something similar in October 2008 as well. A Motorola spokeswoman got in touch with me and categorically denied that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the multi-featured set-top box that can play back DVDs and CDs would use Google&#8217;s Android OS. I had heard something similar in October 2008 as well. A Motorola spokeswoman got in touch with me and categorically denied that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motorola: No Google Android Powered Set-top Box</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-259209</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorola: No Google Android Powered Set-top Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-259209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the multi-featured set-top box that can play back DVDs and CDs would use Google&#8217;s Android OS. I had heard something similar in October 2008 as well. A Motorola spokeswoman got in touch with me and categorically denied that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the multi-featured set-top box that can play back DVDs and CDs would use Google&#8217;s Android OS. I had heard something similar in October 2008 as well. A Motorola spokeswoman got in touch with me and categorically denied that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Android Makes Set-top Box Debut</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-259116</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Android Makes Set-top Box Debut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-259116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] lightweight operating system has been linked with netbooks and various other devices, we thought Android would be ideal for Internet video-focused set-top boxes. Motorola apparently thought so, too, and was said to be working on an Android-based set-top box. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lightweight operating system has been linked with netbooks and various other devices, we thought Android would be ideal for Internet video-focused set-top boxes. Motorola apparently thought so, too, and was said to be working on an Android-based set-top box. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Street</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-164956</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-164956</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m really getting concerned about Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are into everything. I’m worried that they might disrupt a Ouija board next and disrupt the space time continuum sending millions of lost souls along with every search.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It will be like the end of the Haunted Mansion ride at Disney World where the ghosts show up in your car at the end of the ride except with Google they will show up in your webcam. Look out iJustine!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m really getting concerned about Google.</p>
<p>They are into everything. I’m worried that they might disrupt a Ouija board next and disrupt the space time continuum sending millions of lost souls along with every search.</p>
<p>It will be like the end of the Haunted Mansion ride at Disney World where the ghosts show up in your car at the end of the ride except with Google they will show up in your webcam. Look out iJustine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-164939</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-164939</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google should also release a Linux based Google OS a bit like http://www.thinkgos.com/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To make sure there is a consumer friendly Linux installation on cheap computers that is usable by the mass market and which includes the optimal integration of all the Google Apps and integrates well all Linux apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So that we all can buy a $200 Google Phone, $100 Google set-top-box and $200 Google PC, none of which would be manufactured by Google, but all of which run Google Apps and are supported by Google and optimized by them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google should also release a Linux based Google OS a bit like <a href="http://www.thinkgos.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkgos.com/</a></p>
<p>To make sure there is a consumer friendly Linux installation on cheap computers that is usable by the mass market and which includes the optimal integration of all the Google Apps and integrates well all Linux apps.</p>
<p>So that we all can buy a $200 Google Phone, $100 Google set-top-box and $200 Google PC, none of which would be manufactured by Google, but all of which run Google Apps and are supported by Google and optimized by them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldhitz</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-164842</link>
		<dc:creator>coldhitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/11/20/dreaming-of-a-google-set-top-box/#comment-164842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Google has already proven that they are going to lead us all to a better , more usefull , technological future. It&#039;s the companies falling behind...old media...that are most resistant to the change. They keep their old , antiquated ideas polished and in shiny wrappers, and are really keeping the communications game at a stand still. It will take a new company , with fresh ideas , to help things along. Even if it never becomes number one, resistance to change has already put the final nail in the coffin.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Google has already proven that they are going to lead us all to a better , more usefull , technological future. It&#8217;s the companies falling behind&#8230;old media&#8230;that are most resistant to the change. They keep their old , antiquated ideas polished and in shiny wrappers, and are really keeping the communications game at a stand still. It will take a new company , with fresh ideas , to help things along. Even if it never becomes number one, resistance to change has already put the final nail in the coffin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
