<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will There Ever Be Another MovieBeam?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Essay: Can We Stop with the Video CE Hardware Already? &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/#comment-237493</link>
		<dc:creator>Essay: Can We Stop with the Video CE Hardware Already? &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/#comment-237493</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] MovieBeam is emblematic of both the failures of video CE&#8217;s hardware past, and the futility of its future. After floundering for years, being bought and subsequently killed by Movie Gallery, MovieBeam is now in the process of being sold to Dar Capital for $2.25 million. Is that a bargain or a big waste of time and money? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MovieBeam is emblematic of both the failures of video CE&#8217;s hardware past, and the futility of its future. After floundering for years, being bought and subsequently killed by Movie Gallery, MovieBeam is now in the process of being sold to Dar Capital for $2.25 million. Is that a bargain or a big waste of time and money? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MEL</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/#comment-217146</link>
		<dc:creator>MEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/#comment-217146</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Moviebeam failed to target the market it was intended for: those homes that do not spend money on cable or dish television.  For those of us who refuse to support the cable monopoly, Moviebeam was a perfect solution.  I hope PBS takes a look at Moviebeam as a product offering for them, since the signal was being broadcast over their airwaves.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moviebeam failed to target the market it was intended for: those homes that do not spend money on cable or dish television.  For those of us who refuse to support the cable monopoly, Moviebeam was a perfect solution.  I hope PBS takes a look at Moviebeam as a product offering for them, since the signal was being broadcast over their airwaves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt_</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/#comment-202732</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2007/12/21/will-there-ever-be-another-moviebeam/#comment-202732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Its not the set top box its the Bussiness Model&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People want a reasonable priced box  that plugs into thier TV without any messing around .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also pay per view downloads are lame people want a on demand video service similar to cable TV.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A netflix style subscrption service  might work or ad supported service  like Joost .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A box if they charge for it also needs to be under $100 for such a service to become mainstream  or it needs to be a value  added service than works on  existing boxes /consoles .Maybe deals with Sony .Microsoft  and Nintendo and thier online services are needed to get the Mums and Dads interested .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not the set top box its the Bussiness Model</p>
<p>People want a reasonable priced box  that plugs into thier TV without any messing around .</p>
<p>Also pay per view downloads are lame people want a on demand video service similar to cable TV.</p>
<p>A netflix style subscrption service  might work or ad supported service  like Joost .</p>
<p>A box if they charge for it also needs to be under $100 for such a service to become mainstream  or it needs to be a value  added service than works on  existing boxes /consoles .Maybe deals with Sony .Microsoft  and Nintendo and thier online services are needed to get the Mums and Dads interested .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
