<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoFish Says Game Over to Online Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke Alexander</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-268503</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-268503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s more than a year now, but I haven&#039;t heard about came of GoFish.com, did they change name or something?.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s more than a year now, but I haven&#8217;t heard about came of GoFish.com, did they change name or something?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Khan</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-232922</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-232922</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear GoFish,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Going into online video does not differentiate you (well it differentiates you from the guy that is selling homemade jelly). The differentiator is your methodology and that methodology has to be part of your company&#039;s DNA... I will give you guys a hint (sorta obvious if you ask weareindia.tv): user experience is the king maker.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;weareindia.tv&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear GoFish,</p>
<p>Going into online video does not differentiate you (well it differentiates you from the guy that is selling homemade jelly). The differentiator is your methodology and that methodology has to be part of your company&#8217;s DNA&#8230; I will give you guys a hint (sorta obvious if you ask weareindia.tv): user experience is the king maker.</p>
<p>weareindia.tv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Break Decides Its Strength is in Ads, Not Video &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-229947</link>
		<dc:creator>Break Decides Its Strength is in Ads, Not Video &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-229947</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] might recall that earlier this month we wrote about another video site becoming an online ad network: [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] might recall that earlier this month we wrote about another video site becoming an online ad network: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitrios Matsoulis</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-222196</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitrios Matsoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-222196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that I have never look at the GoFish site does not ptove anything of course but the online video has very quickly grown from startup playground to game for the larger boys. I think entering the online video market in niche segments is the best way.
http://electronrun.wordpress.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that I have never look at the GoFish site does not ptove anything of course but the online video has very quickly grown from startup playground to game for the larger boys. I think entering the online video market in niche segments is the best way.<br />
<a href="http://electronrun.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://electronrun.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordonmattey</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-220670</link>
		<dc:creator>gordonmattey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-220670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newteevee/~3/213986487/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“A video destination is just really hard to differentiate,” said Verjee. “It’s really far away from a must-buy for an advertiser or a must-go-to for a consumer.”&lt;/a&gt; Verjee is not wrong.  With mainstream video content it&#039;s not just hard, it&#039;s IMPOSSIBLE.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every studio views the internet as just A N OTHER distribution platform, an inert pipe, where they can count up more eyeballs and sell or share more advertising.  Networks/Broadcasters such as MTV &lt;a href=&quot;http://pressmediawire.com/article.cfm?articleID=4594&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;distribute to anyone that asks&lt;/a&gt;, as long as they take the lions share of revenue.  How do you differentiate when your competitors have the same content?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GoFish like many others are playing into the hands of today&#039;s dominant players.  This strategy does not pay off, the studios/labels will increase the take year after year until they bleed the market dry.  Economically, this is no different than what&#039;s happen&lt;strike&gt;ing&lt;/strike&gt;ed in the music business where people like &lt;a href=&quot;http://newteevee.com/2007/08/01/bolt-gofish-deal-still-not-done/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bolt&lt;/a&gt; and very recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/08/pandora_uk_closes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pandora&lt;/a&gt; [UK] have given up because of trouble licensing music for distribution.  It just becomes too expensive and unviable.
If you want to differentiate, if you want to have a dominant strategy, you have to start again, build from the ground up and rearchitect the value system.  It isn&#039;t easy.  You need a revolutionary mindset.  You need to reinvent TV.
This means revisiting how video is conceived, produced, delivered and experienced by viewers.  From an advertising perspective it means reinventing TV marketing altogether.  Advertising can no longer mean, &quot;distribute content bundled with ads to its network partners&quot;.   Oh let&#039;s just &quot;bundle&quot; some pre-roll, post-roll, mid-roll, banner ads.  This adds ZERO value to the viewer experience, in fact it is detrimental, check out the negative comments on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joost.com/forums/f/ads/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joost&#039;s Forum&lt;/a&gt; re: advertising.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We can&#039;t build on the decaying foundations of the current TV business.  There are a bunch of very clever writers striking in Hollywood who could really help shape this, they&#039;ve been trying to advance the video experience for years but &lt;a href=&quot;http://cms.mit.edu/podcasts/C3FOE2007/2007-11-17-session5-cult_media-640x480.m4v&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;have always been stifled&lt;/a&gt; by the paymasters [networks].&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/newteevee/~3/213986487/" rel="nofollow">“A video destination is just really hard to differentiate,” said Verjee. “It’s really far away from a must-buy for an advertiser or a must-go-to for a consumer.”</a> Verjee is not wrong.  With mainstream video content it&#8217;s not just hard, it&#8217;s IMPOSSIBLE.</p>
<p>Every studio views the internet as just A N OTHER distribution platform, an inert pipe, where they can count up more eyeballs and sell or share more advertising.  Networks/Broadcasters such as MTV <a href="http://pressmediawire.com/article.cfm?articleID=4594" rel="nofollow">distribute to anyone that asks</a>, as long as they take the lions share of revenue.  How do you differentiate when your competitors have the same content?</p>
<p>GoFish like many others are playing into the hands of today&#8217;s dominant players.  This strategy does not pay off, the studios/labels will increase the take year after year until they bleed the market dry.  Economically, this is no different than what&#8217;s happen<strike>ing</strike>ed in the music business where people like <a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/08/01/bolt-gofish-deal-still-not-done/" rel="nofollow">Bolt</a> and very recently <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/08/pandora_uk_closes/" rel="nofollow">Pandora</a> [UK] have given up because of trouble licensing music for distribution.  It just becomes too expensive and unviable.<br />
If you want to differentiate, if you want to have a dominant strategy, you have to start again, build from the ground up and rearchitect the value system.  It isn&#8217;t easy.  You need a revolutionary mindset.  You need to reinvent TV.<br />
This means revisiting how video is conceived, produced, delivered and experienced by viewers.  From an advertising perspective it means reinventing TV marketing altogether.  Advertising can no longer mean, &#8220;distribute content bundled with ads to its network partners&#8221;.   Oh let&#8217;s just &#8220;bundle&#8221; some pre-roll, post-roll, mid-roll, banner ads.  This adds ZERO value to the viewer experience, in fact it is detrimental, check out the negative comments on <a href="http://www.joost.com/forums/f/ads/" rel="nofollow">Joost&#8217;s Forum</a> re: advertising.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t build on the decaying foundations of the current TV business.  There are a bunch of very clever writers striking in Hollywood who could really help shape this, they&#8217;ve been trying to advance the video experience for years but <a href="http://cms.mit.edu/podcasts/C3FOE2007/2007-11-17-session5-cult_media-640x480.m4v" rel="nofollow">have always been stifled</a> by the paymasters [networks].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldhitz</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-220660</link>
		<dc:creator>coldhitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/2008/01/09/gofish-says-game-over-to-online-video/#comment-220660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well... not everyone can hit a homerun with the first swing. There is a bigtime baby boom going on right now and seeing that this will provide a new market of at home parents , this seems to be a wise direction to forge ahead in. Good luck to this new venture.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; not everyone can hit a homerun with the first swing. There is a bigtime baby boom going on right now and seeing that this will provide a new market of at home parents , this seems to be a wise direction to forge ahead in. Good luck to this new venture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
