<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BitGravity&#8217;s Grounds-Up Approach to Content Delivery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/01/30/bitgravity-watching-clips-on-the-net-is-like-listening-to-radio-on-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/30/bitgravity-watching-clips-on-the-net-is-like-listening-to-radio-on-tv/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/30/bitgravity-watching-clips-on-the-net-is-like-listening-to-radio-on-tv/#comment-230410</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/?p=3085#comment-230410</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dan,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll admit, they were pretty sketchy on details. What I was able to get (other than the experience on their homepage, which seems unusually responsive and speaks for itself to a degree) was that they&#039;ve build custom components and are rethinking some assumptions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Using BGP instead of DNS for regional association is a good example. The keyframe thing is cool too. But what I found most interesting was the founder&#039;s background building denial-of-service mitigation services, because that&#039;s really a problem of how to get out more content than you&#039;re being asked for, no matter how much.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll try to get some more specifics from Perry next time I talk to him. Believe me, it wasn&#039;t for lack of trying!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit, they were pretty sketchy on details. What I was able to get (other than the experience on their homepage, which seems unusually responsive and speaks for itself to a degree) was that they&#8217;ve build custom components and are rethinking some assumptions.</p>
<p>Using BGP instead of DNS for regional association is a good example. The keyframe thing is cool too. But what I found most interesting was the founder&#8217;s background building denial-of-service mitigation services, because that&#8217;s really a problem of how to get out more content than you&#8217;re being asked for, no matter how much.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to get some more specifics from Perry next time I talk to him. Believe me, it wasn&#8217;t for lack of trying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Rayburn</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/30/bitgravity-watching-clips-on-the-net-is-like-listening-to-radio-on-tv/#comment-230398</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rayburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/?p=3085#comment-230398</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve read a lot of articles like this about BitGravity lately but all of them seem to be really vague when talking about the service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;scales to large numbers&quot;... what is that number and at what bitrate?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;designed to carry high-definition&quot; .... classified as what exactly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Pricing its services around half the cost of comparable offerings&quot;.... what is the cost and who are they comparing it to?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;video can rival the cable experience&quot;... in what way? quality? depth of content? interaction?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a lot of articles like this about BitGravity lately but all of them seem to be really vague when talking about the service.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>&#8220;scales to large numbers&#8221;&#8230; what is that number and at what bitrate?</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;designed to carry high-definition&#8221; &#8230;. classified as what exactly?</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;Pricing its services around half the cost of comparable offerings&#8221;&#8230;. what is the cost and who are they comparing it to?</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;video can rival the cable experience&#8221;&#8230; in what way? quality? depth of content? interaction?</p>
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coldhitz</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/01/30/bitgravity-watching-clips-on-the-net-is-like-listening-to-radio-on-tv/#comment-230264</link>
		<dc:creator>Coldhitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.wordpress.com/?p=3085#comment-230264</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great article. I&#039;m pretty excited about the new interactive video advances happening in both software and being made by service providers. This Wu seems to be putting together a really well thought out plan. It will open up the true potential of on line entertainment to become more than was even imagined just afew short years ago. Cool.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I&#8217;m pretty excited about the new interactive video advances happening in both software and being made by service providers. This Wu seems to be putting together a really well thought out plan. It will open up the true potential of on line entertainment to become more than was even imagined just afew short years ago. Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
