Comments on: EFF Stirs Fear of Flash DRM http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/eff-stirs-fear-of-flash-drm/ NewTeeVee Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:28:19 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Piracy EFF » Blog Archive » EFF Stirs Fear of Flash DRM http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/eff-stirs-fear-of-flash-drm/#comment-234535 Piracy EFF » Blog Archive » EFF Stirs Fear of Flash DRM Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:28:29 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3252#comment-234535 <p>[...] Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe Electronic Frontier Foundation is upset about Adobe’s efforts to add digital rights management to its extremely popular Flash video format. Since the Digital Millennium Copyright Law (DMCA) forbids circumventing DRM, this could make … [...]</p> [...] Marshall Kirkpatrick wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe Electronic Frontier Foundation is upset about Adobe’s efforts to add digital rights management to its extremely popular Flash video format. Since the Digital Millennium Copyright Law (DMCA) forbids circumventing DRM, this could make … [...]

]]> By: Linux + Flash + DRM = ??? « //syph0s http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/eff-stirs-fear-of-flash-drm/#comment-233311 Linux + Flash + DRM = ??? « //syph0s Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:51:51 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3252#comment-233311 <p>[...] acordo com um artigo no newteevee.com, “a fundação Eletronic Frontier está preocupada sobre os esforços da Adobe para adicionar [...]</p> [...] acordo com um artigo no newteevee.com, “a fundação Eletronic Frontier está preocupada sobre os esforços da Adobe para adicionar [...]

]]> By: TB http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/eff-stirs-fear-of-flash-drm/#comment-232388 TB Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:15:15 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3252#comment-232388 <p>Geraldz, not just paid content but free content that premium content owners want to protect. TV networks for example who are putting ads against premium content. NBC, ABC etc.</p> Geraldz, not just paid content but free content that premium content owners want to protect. TV networks for example who are putting ads against premium content. NBC, ABC etc.

]]> By: geraldz http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/eff-stirs-fear-of-flash-drm/#comment-232305 geraldz Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:26:30 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3252#comment-232305 <p>I agree, Jim. A genious move. Most of the protected content I've come across relies on Microsoft's DRM protocol and therefore must use the WMP. However, it's not cross-platform so Adobe has identified a real market opportunity. This will be a big hit for anyone looking to sell paid content online.</p> I agree, Jim. A genious move. Most of the protected content I’ve come across relies on Microsoft’s DRM protocol and therefore must use the WMP. However, it’s not cross-platform so Adobe has identified a real market opportunity. This will be a big hit for anyone looking to sell paid content online.

]]> By: James Gardiner http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/eff-stirs-fear-of-flash-drm/#comment-232300 James Gardiner Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:45:39 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3252#comment-232300 <p>I am very surprised that Adobe DRM is generating any media now. All this has been on the cards for a long time.</p> <p>And why people are being negative about it. It is a better and far cheaper solution to any other currently available alternatives. And it is truely cross platform.</p> <p>Sure, its a proprietory DRM. But its based on open standards and the DRM server is very resonable priced at $995 and runs on Linux (The expensive one (4-5K) is for sites like ustream.tv which use the colabritive and streaming funtionality. It is not needed for simple DRM activities)</p> <p>In real terms, I think this is a genious move by Adobe. I have a long post on this called. Adobe’s plan for world domination in which I talk a look at some of the long term goals of Adobes strategy. Find it here. http://www.crafted.com.au/blog/2008/01/31/adobe%e2%80%99s-plan-for-world-domination/</p> <p>James</p> I am very surprised that Adobe DRM is generating any media now. All this has been on the cards for a long time.

And why people are being negative about it. It is a better and far cheaper solution to any other currently available alternatives. And it is truely cross platform.

Sure, its a proprietory DRM. But its based on open standards and the DRM server is very resonable priced at $995 and runs on Linux (The expensive one (4-5K) is for sites like ustream.tv which use the colabritive and streaming funtionality. It is not needed for simple DRM activities)

In real terms, I think this is a genious move by Adobe. I have a long post on this called.
Adobe’s plan for world domination
in which I talk a look at some of the long term goals of Adobes strategy.
Find it here.
http://www.crafted.com.au/blog/2008/01/31/adobe%e2%80%99s-plan-for-world-domination/

James

]]> By: geraldz http://newteevee.com/2008/02/21/eff-stirs-fear-of-flash-drm/#comment-232279 geraldz Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:24:52 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3252#comment-232279 <p>If a feed is ad-supported, of what use is DRM? DRM is used to protect paid services - such as access to a live stream (NFL Live) or a movie download.</p> <p>http://RSSLiveTV.com - a quick and easy way to tune internet television stations</p> If a feed is ad-supported, of what use is DRM? DRM is used to protect paid services – such as access to a live stream (NFL Live) or a movie download.

http://RSSLiveTV.com – a quick and easy way to tune internet television stations

]]>