Comments on: Settlement in Viacom vs. YouTube? “Nope” http://newteevee.com/2008/05/07/settlement-in-viacom-vs-youtube-nope/ NewTeeVee Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:17:22 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: GigaNET PM: Cloud Storage, Brazilian Biofuels | DougsTech.com - Tech News, Reviews, and Guides http://newteevee.com/2008/05/07/settlement-in-viacom-vs-youtube-nope/#comment-237485 GigaNET PM: Cloud Storage, Brazilian Biofuels | DougsTech.com - Tech News, Reviews, and Guides Fri, 09 May 2008 03:29:26 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3961#comment-237485 <p>[...] Worker Daily: Three cloud storage services, and two of them aren’t Amazon S3. NewTeeVee: Viacom and YouTube won’t be settling their $1 billion copyright infringement battle out of [...]</p> [...] Worker Daily: Three cloud storage services, and two of them aren’t Amazon S3. NewTeeVee: Viacom and YouTube won’t be settling their $1 billion copyright infringement battle out of [...]

]]> By: GigaNET PM: Cloud Storage, Brazilian Biofuels - GigaOM http://newteevee.com/2008/05/07/settlement-in-viacom-vs-youtube-nope/#comment-237427 GigaNET PM: Cloud Storage, Brazilian Biofuels - GigaOM Wed, 07 May 2008 23:30:23 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3961#comment-237427 <p>[...] Three cloud storage services, and two of them aren’t Amazon S3. NewTeeVee: Viacom and YouTube won’t be settling their $1 billion copyright infringement battle out of court. OStatic: A bushel of free open-source [...]</p> [...] Three cloud storage services, and two of them aren’t Amazon S3. NewTeeVee: Viacom and YouTube won’t be settling their $1 billion copyright infringement battle out of court. OStatic: A bushel of free open-source [...]

]]> By: Chris Albrecht http://newteevee.com/2008/05/07/settlement-in-viacom-vs-youtube-nope/#comment-237415 Chris Albrecht Wed, 07 May 2008 20:16:00 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3961#comment-237415 <p>Hi G,</p> <p>I wasn't referring to the copyright laws when talking about the video landscape. I was referring more to the fact that studios are getting their act together and are better able to reach a big audience on their own. They are less reliant on the likes of YouTube.</p> Hi G,

I wasn’t referring to the copyright laws when talking about the video landscape. I was referring more to the fact that studios are getting their act together and are better able to reach a big audience on their own. They are less reliant on the likes of YouTube.

]]> By: G http://newteevee.com/2008/05/07/settlement-in-viacom-vs-youtube-nope/#comment-237400 G Wed, 07 May 2008 15:49:36 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=3961#comment-237400 <p>"But the online video landscape has changed since Viacom first filed its suit more than a year ago (really? that much time already?)." - Chris it is about copyrights - laws - even if the online landscape has changed - the copyright laws still the same for over 28 years.</p> <p>" YouTube is still the 800-pound, online-video gorilla" - that's what has changed for Viacom - the bigger they are the harder they fall -</p> “But the online video landscape has changed since Viacom first filed its suit more than a year ago (really? that much time already?).” – Chris it is about copyrights – laws – even if the online landscape has changed – the copyright laws still the same for over 28 years.

” YouTube is still the 800-pound, online-video gorilla” – that’s what has changed for Viacom – the bigger they are the harder they fall -

]]>