<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABC Tops in Visits, But CBS Gets More Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/06/03/abc-tops-in-visits-but-cbs-gets-more-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/06/03/abc-tops-in-visits-but-cbs-gets-more-time/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: First Read - Disney&#8217;s Acquisition, ABC.com Stats, EU video CPM and more &#171; Pravda on Media, Technology, and Rebel Filmmaking</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/06/03/abc-tops-in-visits-but-cbs-gets-more-time/#comment-238800</link>
		<dc:creator>First Read - Disney&#8217;s Acquisition, ABC.com Stats, EU video CPM and more &#171; Pravda on Media, Technology, and Rebel Filmmaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4243#comment-238800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] - ABC.com stats are out in the open [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; ABC.com stats are out in the open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/06/03/abc-tops-in-visits-but-cbs-gets-more-time/#comment-238795</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4243#comment-238795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The CW&#039;s number definitely would have been higher if they had kept Gossip Girl online.  How many articles were written about the new revolution of the way people watch television? And how many times was the CW mentioned especially because of the new teen hit, Gossip Girl?  The CW needs to seriously figure out what they want to do--create their own path, make the way ratings are captured (thus changing advertising ways) change.... or try to fall into line behind the other networks and MAKE people watch television when THEY want us to watch television. Because seriously? Would you rather me watch the show... or watch it at 8pm on Monday night? (After you moved it from a perfectly good Wednesday night at 9pm and now it will be fighting against some of the best television shows out there for a place on Monday night! Ah! How stupid is that?)  Anyway... yes. I agree with your remark up there.  And this article was very interesting. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW&#8217;s number definitely would have been higher if they had kept Gossip Girl online.  How many articles were written about the new revolution of the way people watch television? And how many times was the CW mentioned especially because of the new teen hit, Gossip Girl?  The CW needs to seriously figure out what they want to do&#8211;create their own path, make the way ratings are captured (thus changing advertising ways) change&#8230;. or try to fall into line behind the other networks and MAKE people watch television when THEY want us to watch television. Because seriously? Would you rather me watch the show&#8230; or watch it at 8pm on Monday night? (After you moved it from a perfectly good Wednesday night at 9pm and now it will be fighting against some of the best television shows out there for a place on Monday night! Ah! How stupid is that?)  Anyway&#8230; yes. I agree with your remark up there.  And this article was very interesting. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
