<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comcast vs. Your Torrents: A Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/07/11/comcast-vs-your-torrents-a-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/07/11/comcast-vs-your-torrents-a-recap/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Content Producers Take a Stand for Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/07/11/comcast-vs-your-torrents-a-recap/#comment-264704</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Content Producers Take a Stand for Net Neutrality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4612#comment-264704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] BitTorrent throttling is very similar to what Comcast tried in the U.S. until it got forced by the FCC to stop interfering with torrent transmissions. However, the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BitTorrent throttling is very similar to what Comcast tried in the U.S. until it got forced by the FCC to stop interfering with torrent transmissions. However, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comcast: How We&#8217;ve Been Slowing Down BitTorrent &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/07/11/comcast-vs-your-torrents-a-recap/#comment-245652</link>
		<dc:creator>Comcast: How We&#8217;ve Been Slowing Down BitTorrent &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=4612#comment-245652</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] That doesn&#8217;t sound to effective, does it? Apparently, it isn&#8217;t. The filing also reveals that Comcast is still seeing around 50 percent of its upstream bandwidth consumed by P2P applications. In some areas, file swapping even causes up to two-thirds of all upstream bandwidth. Comcast stated in an earlier filing with the FCC that it was necessary to use these technologies because otherwise 80 percent of the bandwidth would be consumed by 20 percent of its users. Maybe getting that number down to 60-some percent wasn&#8217;t really worth all that uproar. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That doesn&#8217;t sound to effective, does it? Apparently, it isn&#8217;t. The filing also reveals that Comcast is still seeing around 50 percent of its upstream bandwidth consumed by P2P applications. In some areas, file swapping even causes up to two-thirds of all upstream bandwidth. Comcast stated in an earlier filing with the FCC that it was necessary to use these technologies because otherwise 80 percent of the bandwidth would be consumed by 20 percent of its users. Maybe getting that number down to 60-some percent wasn&#8217;t really worth all that uproar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
