YouTube Fights Infringement With Advertising
YouTube, as we mentioned this morning, was sued yet again on Wednesday, this time by Italian television company Mediaset over copyright concerns. The lawsuit, filed in Rome, charges the video-sharing site with “illegal distribution and commercial use of audio and video files,” and asks for at least $779 million.
The Google-owned company’s response to requests for comment about the lawsuit seemed to come with a sigh: “There is no need for legal action and all the associated costs.” Meanwhile a YouTube spokesperson said in a phone conversation Wednesday that the site has had increasing success with its own method of fighting copyright infringement, called Video ID.
With Video ID, YouTube asks content owners to submit an index of everything they want to protect, and checks fresh uploads to make sure they don’t match. If they do, YouTube will either pull the clip or place advertising against it.
An important measure of success, said the spokesperson, was that content owners are now choosing in 90 percent of cases of identified infringing content to place ads against the video rather than take it down. (This stat was to some extent previously reported by the L.A. Times, but it wasn’t clearly described.) Further, some partners, like Lionsgate, are actually encouraging fans to upload versions of their content.
YouTube does not disclose a list of names of its partners, and to be sure, content owners who aren’t friendly to the site aren’t going to hand it a disk with all their precious movies and TV shows. But this is an interesting benchmark for this new cooperative way of fighting infringement, which seems to be becoming a standard as independents — like the startup we wrote about yesterday, Anvato — adopt it as well.
Comments (1)
Linkbacks (6)
-
[...] previously said that in 90 percent of cases in which infringing content is identified, content owners are choosing [...]
-
[...] of its total videos. The site has recently been trying to milk that segment for more money by offering content owners the option to monetize copies of their shows and movies caught in YouTube’s copyright filter, and automatically [...]
-
[...] Yuck. Sounds like a bunch of work and no chance of a payoff. The best alternative is to discourage illicit uploads by making your own content readily available in a timely fashion through official means. And to be sure, just about all TV networks are at least starting to do that. Or you could accept that fan uploads are going to happen, and extend option c to let YouTube leave up the unauthorized uploads it finds, but sell advertising against them (yes, it’s being done). [...]
-
[...] story notes, YouTube rolled out similar technology earlier this year, giving copyright holders the option of monetizing their content rather than removing it. And some are taking that [...]
-
[...] and upload on their own videos. Meanwhile, companies like Auditude, FreeWheel and Attributor, and YouTube are helping content owners identify and monetize user upload. So even though RedLasso is back on [...]
-
[...] as 35 percent of unauthorized video uploads for a given copyright holder are on YouTube. YouTube has said that 90 percent of cases of it discovering content partners’ infringement is identified, [...]
Leave a Reply
Popular
Recent
Network
- The Bannen Way Hits 8.4M Streams Since its Crackle Debut [NewTeeVee]
- The Tangled Web: PA Semi, Processors, and Magic [TheAppleBlog]
- OpenOffice.org by the Numbers [OStatic]
- Q&A: Stewart Butterfield on the Launch of Glitch [GigaOM]
- Coworking Stories: Manchester’s MadLab [WebWorkerDaily]
- The Best & Worst Biofuel Startups [Earth2Tech]
© 2010 The GigaOM Network. Marketing consulting by ACS.


In some ways this sounds familiar to the way online music is handling the same situation via Sound Exchange (in terms of a system that monitors usage by indexing protected or played content). Again however, this may only work in the US with the safe harbor provision in the DMCA.
MBridge
http://www.MBridge.com