<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court: Veoh Not Guilty of Copyright Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/08/27/court-veoh-not-guilty-of-copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/08/27/court-veoh-not-guilty-of-copyright-infringement/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What Veoh&#8217;s Court Victory Means for Online Video Sites</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/08/27/court-veoh-not-guilty-of-copyright-infringement/#comment-268418</link>
		<dc:creator>What Veoh&#8217;s Court Victory Means for Online Video Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=7429#comment-268418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] raising of additional capital, and hindering the closing of strategic partners. (Though this was not the only lawsuit Veoh was fighting.) So &#8212; if we read the situation as Veoh taking a bullet for the rest of the video industry [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] raising of additional capital, and hindering the closing of strategic partners. (Though this was not the only lawsuit Veoh was fighting.) So &#8212; if we read the situation as Veoh taking a bullet for the rest of the video industry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peHUB &#187; First Read</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/08/27/court-veoh-not-guilty-of-copyright-infringement/#comment-244697</link>
		<dc:creator>peHUB &#187; First Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=7429#comment-244697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] A court has ruled that video sharing site Veoh is not liable for copyrighted material posted to its site (and adult [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A court has ruled that video sharing site Veoh is not liable for copyrighted material posted to its site (and adult [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viacom on Veoh Ruling: So What? &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/08/27/court-veoh-not-guilty-of-copyright-infringement/#comment-244371</link>
		<dc:creator>Viacom on Veoh Ruling: So What? &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=7429#comment-244371</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] So&#160;What?  As could be expected, Viacom said it doesn&#8217;t care about video-sharing site Veoh&#8217;s recent legal victory in a copyright infringement case. Viacom, which is suing YouTube for $1 billion, issued the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So&nbsp;What?  As could be expected, Viacom said it doesn&#8217;t care about video-sharing site Veoh&#8217;s recent legal victory in a copyright infringement case. Viacom, which is suing YouTube for $1 billion, issued the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
