<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Campaign Wants Special Exception From DMCA Takedowns on YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren Glenn</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247691</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247691</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I heard about this on CNet&#039;s podcast with Molly Wood.  This is like the times when politicans get stuck in morning traffic due to government construction zones and THEN they realize how their decisions affect the rest of us.  If anything, this should&#039;ve happened much sooner.  I wonder if this would be illegal if they showed people watching these news segments on a TV in the ad?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Either way, most of the people who voted for the DMCA probably never read the damn thing before signing it otherwise there would&#039;ve been at least 1 dissenter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about this on CNet&#8217;s podcast with Molly Wood.  This is like the times when politicans get stuck in morning traffic due to government construction zones and THEN they realize how their decisions affect the rest of us.  If anything, this should&#8217;ve happened much sooner.  I wonder if this would be illegal if they showed people watching these news segments on a TV in the ad?</p>
<p>Either way, most of the people who voted for the DMCA probably never read the damn thing before signing it otherwise there would&#8217;ve been at least 1 dissenter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For an eye-opening discussion of the problem of copyright &quot;overreaching&quot; in this and other contexts, see Jason Mazzone’s article, “Copyfraud,” published by New York University. It is available for (free) download here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an eye-opening discussion of the problem of copyright &#8220;overreaching&#8221; in this and other contexts, see Jason Mazzone’s article, “Copyfraud,” published by New York University. It is available for (free) download here: <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=787244</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could McCain&#8217;s Fury Ignite DMCA Revisions? &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247397</link>
		<dc:creator>Could McCain&#8217;s Fury Ignite DMCA Revisions? &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247397</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] way Congress and web hosts handle copyright claims. The suggestions come less than a week after the  the McCain presidential campaign  found itself on the wrong side of a takedown [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way Congress and web hosts handle copyright claims. The suggestions come less than a week after the  the McCain presidential campaign  found itself on the wrong side of a takedown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vid-Biz: McCain, FYI, Redbox &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247118</link>
		<dc:creator>Vid-Biz: McCain, FYI, Redbox &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247118</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...]  McCain&#8217;s Special YouTube Takedown Request Denied; the presidential candidate raised the issue of how quickly political videos were yanked from the site, but YouTube rejected the idea of a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  McCain&#8217;s Special YouTube Takedown Request Denied; the presidential candidate raised the issue of how quickly political videos were yanked from the site, but YouTube rejected the idea of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247078</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not terribly surprised, as politicians already manage to get &quot;except for politicians&quot; clauses in telemarketing laws and spam laws.  Why wouldn&#039;t they want the same for DMCA enforcement?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not terribly surprised, as politicians already manage to get &#8220;except for politicians&#8221; clauses in telemarketing laws and spam laws.  Why wouldn&#8217;t they want the same for DMCA enforcement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain Campaign asks YouTube to ignore the DMCA</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247062</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain Campaign asks YouTube to ignore the DMCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] (in part via NewTeeVee) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (in part via NewTeeVee) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uhhh</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247050</link>
		<dc:creator>uhhh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247050</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;how come we can&#039;t print articles on newteevee ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how come we can&#8217;t print articles on newteevee ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chutry Experiment &#187; Back from Austin</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247049</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chutry Experiment &#187; Back from Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247049</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] of copyright and the fair use of news clips in many of the viral videos.  McChris reports that according to a NewTeeVee story, the McCain campaign has contacted YouTube asking them to evaluate the fair use of news material in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of copyright and the fair use of news clips in many of the viral videos.  McChris reports that according to a NewTeeVee story, the McCain campaign has contacted YouTube asking them to evaluate the fair use of news material in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terror in the Heartland &#187; Fair Use on YouTube</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247046</link>
		<dc:creator>Terror in the Heartland &#187; Fair Use on YouTube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247046</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] NewTeeVee has a story that describes how the McCain campaign has sent letters to YouTube, asking the service to evaluate the fair use of news material used in McCain-Palin advertisements. Apparently the service has taken down McCain ads after news organizations have sent YouTube DMCA notices because the ads poached materials from their broadcasts. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NewTeeVee has a story that describes how the McCain campaign has sent letters to YouTube, asking the service to evaluate the fair use of news material used in McCain-Palin advertisements. Apparently the service has taken down McCain ads after news organizations have sent YouTube DMCA notices because the ads poached materials from their broadcasts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendrik Rood</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247045</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendrik Rood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love these complaints. Effectively it puts both candidates campaign with their nose on the far reaching powers that have been given to the DMCA.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing I allways point people on, who ask why the European Parliament is so willing to intervene on international mobile roaming rates, is that they themselves are one of the groups that get hit by high roaming rates the most. That is a strong stimulus for political mind share.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, watch the DMCA being altered in the forthcoming years, now that both parties have been confronted with the result of their legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love these complaints. Effectively it puts both candidates campaign with their nose on the far reaching powers that have been given to the DMCA.</p>
<p>One thing I allways point people on, who ask why the European Parliament is so willing to intervene on international mobile roaming rates, is that they themselves are one of the groups that get hit by high roaming rates the most. That is a strong stimulus for political mind share.</p>
<p>So, watch the DMCA being altered in the forthcoming years, now that both parties have been confronted with the result of their legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Street</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/10/14/mccain-campaign-wants-special-exception-from-dmca-takedowns-on-youtube/#comment-247043</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=10003#comment-247043</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So are both campaigns doing something that is illegal by posting footage that they don&#039;t have the rights to on YouTube?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are both campaigns in violation of US LAW?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are both campaigns doing something that is illegal by posting footage that they don&#8217;t have the rights to on YouTube?</p>
<p>Are both campaigns in violation of US LAW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
