Amazon Helps Encoding.com Slash Video Costs
Last week brand-new video startup Encoding.com was named a finalist in Amazon’s Start-Up Challenge, one of seven in the running for $100,000 in cash and Amazon Web Services credits and a possible investment from Amazon. Resource-intensive video startups have a pretty good record in the competition — if you can say such a thing for a one-year-old event. Last year video platform Ooyala took home the grand prize, and Justin.tv was a finalist.
Denver-based Encoding.com uses on-demand cloud computing to enable pay-as-you-go video encoding (translation: transforming an uploaded file from whatever format it comes in into a clip fit to play on the Internet, mobile or elsewhere). Whereas other costs like content delivery are being commoditized, encoding is still a hassle. What most people do is set up servers to run software like FFmpeg or On2’s Flix, or buy dedicated appliances from companies like RipCode.
But by supplementing its own internal server farm with Amazon elastic computing, Encoding.com can adjust to usage spikes, and altogether take 30 to 40 percent off the cost of running your own server farm, according to founder Greggory Heil.
On-demand may be a differentiator now — and Encoding.com was quick to come to market after being founded in June of this year — but competition is imminent. On2 announced last week it would partner with Zencoder to offer an on-demand encoding direct competitor.
Another challenge is that the biggies like YouTube already have their encoding infrastructure set up in-house, and are unlikely to outsource to a startup. But with also-ran players looking to cut costs, Encoding.com could pick up a few large sites. For now, its most notable customers are college reviews site Unigo, film production video site MovieSet (our coverage), and extreme sports video platform Mobilerider.
Heil said Encoding.com has six employees and is self-financed.
Next up in the startup challenge: Each of the companies is visiting Amazon in Seattle to present in person. The final decision will be made by a panel of judges.
Comments (4)
Linkbacks (3)
-
[...] The company recently scored a deal to power MySpace’s mobile video. It faces new competition from the likes of Encoding.com, which offers on-demand pay-as-you-go encoding. [...]
-
[...] from cloud computing alternatives — we’ve written about ones such as HD Cloud and Encoding.com — because content providers require a sturdier solution. However he made it clear Elemental [...]
-
[...] Video Gets a Guarantee This week Encoding.com, the provider of pay-as-you-go video encoding powered by Amazon Web Services, started offering service level agreements that guarantee it will process its customers’ [...]
Leave a Reply
Popular
- Tumblr Marriage Proposal: Behind the Scenes of Justin and Marissa's Engagement
- BitTorrent After The Pirate Bay: Do You Still Need Trackers?
- Ten Sites for Free and Legal Torrents
- Nielsen: Facebook Now the No. 3 Video Site
- The Megawoosh Waterslide Viral: How It Was Really Done
- Six Steps To Get More HD From Your Scientific Atlanta Set-top Box
Recent
Network
- Earth2Tech Week in Review [Earth2Tech]
- WWD Weekend Reading List [WebWorkerDaily]
- Google’s Past Failures Offer Perspective on Chrome OS Release [GigaOM]
- WinMo Wrap: Marketplace Hits All WM 6.x Phones; Opera Mobile Advances [jkOnTheRun]
- Weekly App Store Picks: November 21, 2009 [TheAppleBlog]
- Get Ready for Flash Player 10.1 to Stream P2P Video to Millions, Swap Files BitTorrent-style [NewTeeVee]
© 2009 The GigaOM Network. Marketing consulting by ACS.


Interesting but their competitive advantage can easily be mimicked by entrenched players. What is the barrier to entry?
And what customer segment are they targeting? The premium content providers will not use them, low end will be satisfied with Youtube, etc. So they are left with mid tier market (semi pro).
I see them being part of a larger video platform play – tie up with services provided by Brightcoves of the world. Thoughts?
Good thoughts Akash — I agree. The mid-tier providers are proliferating though. I think the key is to tie up with white-label video platforms. That type of customer wants a one-stop shop.
The problem is still that these solutions require transcoding on a server after the user uploads something. What needs to happen is that the transcode happens locally on the end-user’s computer before its uploaded. This will scale perfectly since its harnessing the power of the submitting PC, the quality is better since the user doesnt have to make a compressed file first only to be uploaded to be further compressed, and there is no internal server side costs. Check out: http://www.framecaster.com/howitworks.html
This solution is the best for completely removing server side costs. And whats best, the video goes straight from the end-user to the destination with no stop gaps.
Did you know you can post comments automatically on websites like YouTube, XTube, Revver and more? You don’t? I’ll teach you how! Post comments automatically on video sharing websites, promote your websites, products and services automatically! YouTube Comments Poster – the best way to promote products and services for people who are interested in your niche!