<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vid-Biz: Gmail Video, Flip, ConAgra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/11/12/vid-biz-gmail-video-flip-conagra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/12/vid-biz-gmail-video-flip-conagra/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Eyeing Flip Maker, Pure Digital &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/12/vid-biz-gmail-video-flip-conagra/#comment-256395</link>
		<dc:creator>Cisco Eyeing Flip Maker, Pure Digital &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11775#comment-256395</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] November, Deloitte ranked Pure Digital fifth on its list of fastest-growing companies in North America. Earlier that same month, Pure released [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November, Deloitte ranked Pure Digital fifth on its list of fastest-growing companies in North America. Earlier that same month, Pure released [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExtendMedia Raises $10M for Video Platforms &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/12/vid-biz-gmail-video-flip-conagra/#comment-250227</link>
		<dc:creator>ExtendMedia Raises $10M for Video Platforms &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11775#comment-250227</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] total funding amounts to $23 Update: $33 million. It has approximately 50 employees, and it released a new version of its platform earlier this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] total funding amounts to $23 Update: $33 million. It has approximately 50 employees, and it released a new version of its platform earlier this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Cowbell</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/12/vid-biz-gmail-video-flip-conagra/#comment-248842</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Cowbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=11775#comment-248842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After two days, &quot;Working Lunch&quot; is shaping up to be pretty bad. There&#039;s one LITTLE detail about about improv comedy that someone didn&#039;t think about: an audience. A live audience is what drives good improv. The actors get instant feedback about what&#039;s working and what&#039;s not --they know whether to wring more out of something that&#039;s generating laughs, or more importantly, know when to go ahead and shoot the lame horse and move on. There are far too many moments in &quot;Working Lunch&quot; where the actors just don&#039;t know whether to keep panning for gold or move on. It&#039;s awkward and unfunny. Day two seems to have ironed out some bandwidth/interface issues and avoided the on air mistakes in camerawork and cues to the voted plot turns. This one&#039;s a dog.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After two days, &#8220;Working Lunch&#8221; is shaping up to be pretty bad. There&#8217;s one LITTLE detail about about improv comedy that someone didn&#8217;t think about: an audience. A live audience is what drives good improv. The actors get instant feedback about what&#8217;s working and what&#8217;s not &#8211;they know whether to wring more out of something that&#8217;s generating laughs, or more importantly, know when to go ahead and shoot the lame horse and move on. There are far too many moments in &#8220;Working Lunch&#8221; where the actors just don&#8217;t know whether to keep panning for gold or move on. It&#8217;s awkward and unfunny. Day two seems to have ironed out some bandwidth/interface issues and avoided the on air mistakes in camerawork and cues to the voted plot turns. This one&#8217;s a dog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
