<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Web Hurting Guilty Pleasure TV Shows?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh Schwartz Is Too Cool for TV</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-259564</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Schwartz Is Too Cool for TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-259564</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Schwartz said he disagreed with the CW&#8217;s decision to take down free streaming episodes of Gossip Girl last year in an attempt to drive live viewer numbers up. &#8220;We fought them on that. People who watch online don&#8217;t always also watch on TV,&#8221; he said. (The CW eventually came around and resumed posting episodes on its site, where they are &#8220;disproportionately popular,&#8221; according to Schwartz. We have a little theory that has something to do with the show being a guilty pleasure.) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Schwartz said he disagreed with the CW&#8217;s decision to take down free streaming episodes of Gossip Girl last year in an attempt to drive live viewer numbers up. &#8220;We fought them on that. People who watch online don&#8217;t always also watch on TV,&#8221; he said. (The CW eventually came around and resumed posting episodes on its site, where they are &#8220;disproportionately popular,&#8221; according to Schwartz. We have a little theory that has something to do with the show being a guilty pleasure.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TVloop Blog - Discussing TV and Social Media</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-251719</link>
		<dc:creator>TVloop Blog - Discussing TV and Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-251719</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Guilty Pleasures Who would be a good TV fan without some secret guilty pleasures? 2008 marked several of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guilty Pleasures Who would be a good TV fan without some secret guilty pleasures? 2008 marked several of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakir Razak</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-249411</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakir Razak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-249411</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;because their audience could care less about the TV...... — it’s all at their fingertips.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but good journalism/english requires this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then why don&#039;t they care less?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why waste effort caring more than they need to, if, as you/they say, &quot;they could care less&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Or are they complaining that they want to care less but that they find themselves unable to care less for some reason?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Did you mean to say, &quot;they couldn&#039;t care less&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;: j&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Doesn&#039;t Hiro-Media have some sort of measurement facility?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think as the market develops, and broadcaster acceptance of open digital distribution occurs, illegal bit-torrent really won&#039;t be an issue, when it&#039;s all above board and doesn&#039;t require illegal use to get the latest content.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not like Nielsen is absolutely accurate as it is - and it&#039;s been adequate for all this time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shakir Razak&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;because their audience could care less about the TV&#8230;&#8230; — it’s all at their fingertips.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Sorry, but good journalism/english requires this:</p>
<p>Then why don&#8217;t they care less?</p>
<p>Why waste effort caring more than they need to, if, as you/they say, &#8220;they could care less&#8221;?</p>
<p>Or are they complaining that they want to care less but that they find themselves unable to care less for some reason?</p>
<p>Did you mean to say, &#8220;they couldn&#8217;t care less&#8221;?</p>
<p>: j</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t Hiro-Media have some sort of measurement facility?</p>
<p>I think as the market develops, and broadcaster acceptance of open digital distribution occurs, illegal bit-torrent really won&#8217;t be an issue, when it&#8217;s all above board and doesn&#8217;t require illegal use to get the latest content.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like Nielsen is absolutely accurate as it is &#8211; and it&#8217;s been adequate for all this time.</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Shakir Razak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-249393</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-249393</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m an 18 year old male and I watch Gossip Girl online at 3am the night it airs. Am I embarrassed? Not technically, my friends know I watch it. But still, I watch it online because it&#039;s a guilty pleasure show and I&#039;d rather watch it in private.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an 18 year old male and I watch Gossip Girl online at 3am the night it airs. Am I embarrassed? Not technically, my friends know I watch it. But still, I watch it online because it&#8217;s a guilty pleasure show and I&#8217;d rather watch it in private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-249374</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-249374</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that the TV rating system is completely broken. Most TV viewers outside the US are getting their content via Bit torrent and a great site that is tracking this is http://www.showinsider.com/ which monitors and tracks major peer to peer networks. The networks need to look at other areas where users are consuming their TV shows.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the TV rating system is completely broken. Most TV viewers outside the US are getting their content via Bit torrent and a great site that is tracking this is <a href="http://www.showinsider.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.showinsider.com/</a> which monitors and tracks major peer to peer networks. The networks need to look at other areas where users are consuming their TV shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Loving</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-249331</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Loving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-249331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I think &quot;guilty pleasure&quot; TV shows will be watched much less often now. However, I think the effect will be evened out by being able to access more shows overall.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think &#8220;guilty pleasure&#8221; TV shows will be watched much less often now. However, I think the effect will be evened out by being able to access more shows overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeoman</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-249330</link>
		<dc:creator>yeoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-249330</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;there&#039;s no $ to be made on the internet period.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s no $ to be made on the internet period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TVloop Blog - That largest online community for TV fans</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-249326</link>
		<dc:creator>TVloop Blog - That largest online community for TV fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-249326</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] a great post today over at NewTeeVee about whether the Web hurts guilty pleasure TV shows because a significant number of viewers watch the show online rather than during its normal [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a great post today over at NewTeeVee about whether the Web hurts guilty pleasure TV shows because a significant number of viewers watch the show online rather than during its normal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Nelson</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/11/20/is-the-web-hurting-guilty-pleasure-tv-shows/#comment-249324</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=12449#comment-249324</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pet peeve: The phrase is &quot;couldn&#039;t care less.&quot; &quot;Could care less&quot; implies that the viewers DO care, which in this case negates your whole point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The TV ratings game is very broken. I&#039;m surprised that the major networks don&#039;t just gauge shows based on ad impressions by now, anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pet peeve: The phrase is &#8220;couldn&#8217;t care less.&#8221; &#8220;Could care less&#8221; implies that the viewers DO care, which in this case negates your whole point.</p>
<p>The TV ratings game is very broken. I&#8217;m surprised that the major networks don&#8217;t just gauge shows based on ad impressions by now, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
