<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SF Mayor Newsom Takes His 7.5-Hour Case to YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2008/12/01/sf-mayor-newsom-takes-his-75-hour-case-to-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/12/01/sf-mayor-newsom-takes-his-75-hour-case-to-youtube/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gannes</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/12/01/sf-mayor-newsom-takes-his-75-hour-case-to-youtube/#comment-250177</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Gannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=13069#comment-250177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the added detail, Rich. That&#039;s pretty crazy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the added detail, Rich. That&#8217;s pretty crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Bartlebaugh</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2008/12/01/sf-mayor-newsom-takes-his-75-hour-case-to-youtube/#comment-250171</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Bartlebaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=13069#comment-250171</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering if you would report on this. The idea is interesting, although the delivery has a few design flaws.
Crewing it, we thought it was going to be a series of 10 minute takes (for YouTube attention span)... then the first presentation went for 50 minutes without a stop. Uh-oh.
There are only two edits in the 7 hours: one for a PowerPoint failure and one for an incorrect statement on a legal issue. He didn&#039;t use a teleprompter or any other notes. Even though I didn&#039;t appreciate being there until 1am, I was impressed by his comprehensive understanding of all this material. 
Hope somebody watches it...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you would report on this. The idea is interesting, although the delivery has a few design flaws.<br />
Crewing it, we thought it was going to be a series of 10 minute takes (for YouTube attention span)&#8230; then the first presentation went for 50 minutes without a stop. Uh-oh.<br />
There are only two edits in the 7 hours: one for a PowerPoint failure and one for an incorrect statement on a legal issue. He didn&#8217;t use a teleprompter or any other notes. Even though I didn&#8217;t appreciate being there until 1am, I was impressed by his comprehensive understanding of all this material.<br />
Hope somebody watches it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
