<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Want Widgets on Your TV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/</link>
	<description>NewTeeVee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do You Want Widgets on Your TV? TDG Says You Do &#171; NewTeeVee</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-256852</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Want Widgets on Your TV? TDG Says You Do &#171; NewTeeVee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-256852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] You Want Widgets on Your TV? TDG Says You&#160;Do  We&#8217;ve asked before whether you really want widgets on your TV, and new data from The Diffusion Group indicates that yes indeed, you do want a dedicated area to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You Want Widgets on Your TV? TDG Says You&nbsp;Do  We&#8217;ve asked before whether you really want widgets on your TV, and new data from The Diffusion Group indicates that yes indeed, you do want a dedicated area to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Bennett</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-252302</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-252302</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I definitely don&#039;t get the love affair in the industry right now with widgets on your TV.  I personally have no use for them as I generally have my laptop with me everytime I have the TV on.  Why would I want to screw with my viewing experience when I can do whatever I want on my PC.  I suppose some folks don&#039;t have laptops, but are they really the target market for TV widgets? Probably not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely don&#8217;t get the love affair in the industry right now with widgets on your TV.  I personally have no use for them as I generally have my laptop with me everytime I have the TV on.  Why would I want to screw with my viewing experience when I can do whatever I want on my PC.  I suppose some folks don&#8217;t have laptops, but are they really the target market for TV widgets? Probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Weiner</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-252284</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-252284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I saw the demo, and it&#039;s amazing how transparent the widgets can be. Having been around interactive TV from its early, oddball days, I have to say this Yahoo&#039;s connect TV platform is something special. The lack of a bridge solution for those of us with perfectly fine big LCDs or plasmas is an issue. The Neulion box, powered by Move Networks, is also worth watching.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the demo, and it&#8217;s amazing how transparent the widgets can be. Having been around interactive TV from its early, oddball days, I have to say this Yahoo&#8217;s connect TV platform is something special. The lack of a bridge solution for those of us with perfectly fine big LCDs or plasmas is an issue. The Neulion box, powered by Move Networks, is also worth watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-252276</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-252276</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&#039;t buy a TV specifically for it, but the option is good to have. Customised tickers would certainly be beneficial&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t buy a TV specifically for it, but the option is good to have. Customised tickers would certainly be beneficial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aplusjbm2009</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-252267</link>
		<dc:creator>aplusjbm2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-252267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;sounds like it benefits the programmer more than the customer, so I says no&#039;s. Also sounds like I would need to buy a new tv to get it to work and this new tv basically sounds like a computer, which I already have.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like it benefits the programmer more than the customer, so I says no&#8217;s. Also sounds like I would need to buy a new tv to get it to work and this new tv basically sounds like a computer, which I already have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hubert</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-252265</link>
		<dc:creator>hubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-252265</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Widgets will do for iTV what the iPhone did for the mobile internet. Relevant apps and information beat any mediocre browsing experience.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Widgets will do for iTV what the iPhone did for the mobile internet. Relevant apps and information beat any mediocre browsing experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Coseven</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-252233</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Coseven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-252233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t imagine anyone worth advertising to that couldn&#039;t afford a $200 netbook to hold while they watch their enormous LCD TV.  Why rob the precious TV real estate?  Makes more sense than adding $300 to the cost of a TV set.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine anyone worth advertising to that couldn&#8217;t afford a $200 netbook to hold while they watch their enormous LCD TV.  Why rob the precious TV real estate?  Makes more sense than adding $300 to the cost of a TV set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://newteevee.com/2009/01/09/do-you-want-widgets-on-your-tv/#comment-252211</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=15639#comment-252211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that widgets would be distracting and would probably interfere with the viewing experience.  But the notion of offering viewers a natural way to discover more about the brands and merchandise they see in videos is really a key to TV 2.0, it seems to me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A company I have recently become familiar with called GET Interactive has an unobtrusive, opt-in way for viewers to learn more about all the brands and merchandise they see in digital media.  Importantly, it doesn&#039;t alter the video at all, so no interruption of the viewing experience and no re-encoding.  And it uses industry standard player technology, so it&#039;s transportable across viral channels.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that widgets would be distracting and would probably interfere with the viewing experience.  But the notion of offering viewers a natural way to discover more about the brands and merchandise they see in videos is really a key to TV 2.0, it seems to me.</p>
<p>A company I have recently become familiar with called GET Interactive has an unobtrusive, opt-in way for viewers to learn more about all the brands and merchandise they see in digital media.  Importantly, it doesn&#8217;t alter the video at all, so no interruption of the viewing experience and no re-encoding.  And it uses industry standard player technology, so it&#8217;s transportable across viral channels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
