Updated: Is This the Year for Interactive TV?
This article was written by Ben Homer, a NewTeeVee contributor who runs the site Online Video Watch.
Updated: More than 55 million homes will could be interactive TV-enabled by the end of 2009. according to research firm SNL Kagan, a number expected to reach 75 million by the end of 2010. Currently there are 30 million homes capable of receiving interactive programming as a result of the Enhanced TV Binary Interchange Format standard employed NDS and OpenTV standards employed by DirecTV and DISH Network, respectively. Research firm SNL Kagan expects the Enhanced TV Binary Interchange Format (EBIF) standard will be rolled out to an additional 25 million-plus digital cable and Verizon FiOS subscribers this year. In the meantime, ESPN recently became the first U.S. network to announce they will soon go fully interactive 24/7. In other words, this year should be a tipping point for interactive TV.
Interactive TV, which connects digital broadcast television to the Internet to enable a two-way viewing experience, has existed in Europe for years, but here in the U.S. it’s been handicapped by strict government regulations and cable operators resistant to change after years as operating monopolies.
Now that widespread consumption of online video is beginning put pressure on cable operators, we may finally be at a tipping point. Cable operator joint ventures in the form of Project Canoe and Tru2way, as well as the already widespread OpenTV platform, are finally making interactive television possible in the U.S. on a large scale.
“This is the year for interactive television,” Dalen Harrison, CEO of Ensequence, one of the companies leading the creation of interactive television experiences in the U.S., told us this week at the OnMedia conference in New York. “We’re seeing broad deployments with television networks going interactive.” The Portland-based company provides a single authoring tool to deliver interactive content across all platforms for cable companies, networks and advertisers. It first came onto our radar in 2007 when it announced $40 million in Series C funding; it has since signed up an impressive client list.
Ensequence powered NBC Universal’s interactive Summer Olympics broadcast for DISH Networks, which was utilized by 41 percent of subscribers. It’s powered QVC UK’s interactive service, allowing viewers to purchase items using only their remote control, since October of 2008.
“Anything that keeps [viewers] on television is a far better proposition than sending them the Internet,” Harrison said. And the results speak for themselves. He says that, on average, when interactive elements are present, 20 percent of viewers spend 5 minutes interacting. During SpikeTV’s interactive broadcast of the Video Game Awards in 2007, 25 percent of the audience spent a half hour interacting on a two-hour show.
Above: SpikeTV Interactive Features During the 2007 VGAs
According to Harrison, the selling point of interactive TV for programmers, advertisers and MSOs is clear. “It combines the reach of television with the measurement accountability of the Internet,” he said. “You can use your current remote control, current set-top box, no change in hardware. You have a call to action on your television set and it just works.”
ESPN clearly agrees. Starting in June, it will begin rolling out three new interactive features on its networks: A polling application tentatively called ESPN My Vote; ESPN In Game Extra, which will enable viewers to get additional stats and information during live events; and My Bottom Line, which will be available to Tru2way viewers anywhere ESPN displays a bottom line.
That said, it’s still early days. There are a number of hurdles for companies seeking to provide more innovative interactive experiences in the U.S to overcome, and a lot of work to be done in order to standardize interactive ad formats and bring interactive TV to the mainstream. And even if it is possible to reach 100 million households with interactive experiences, that doesn’t mean networks will be able to monetize it or that advertisers will flock to change their existing methods. But for viewers new interactive features can’t hurt, and we can look forward to seeing more of these in the coming months
Comments (5)
Linkbacks (2)
-
[...] NewTeeVee has a story about the deployment of interactive TV this year–and the regulations that have prevented its mainstream reach in the past–here. [...]
-
[...] NewTeeVee has a story about the deployment of Interactive TV this year–and the regulations that have prevented its mainstream reach in the past–here. [...]
Leave a Reply
Popular
- BitTorrent After The Pirate Bay: Do You Still Need Trackers?
- Tumblr Marriage Proposal: Behind the Scenes of Justin and Marissa's Engagement
- Ten Sites for Free and Legal Torrents
- Get Ready for Flash Player 10.1 to Stream P2P Video to Millions, Swap Files BitTorrent-style
- The Megawoosh Waterslide Viral: How It Was Really Done
- Six Steps To Get More HD From Your Scientific Atlanta Set-top Box
Recent
- BitTorrent After The Pirate Bay: Do You Still Need Trackers?
- Microsoft and Nielsen Partner for 1 vs. 100 Measurement
- Premium Content Drives Connected Device Adoption
- Site Sponsor: Twistage
- Tumblr Marriage Proposal: Behind the Scenes of Justin and Marissa’s Engagement
- Sungale’s Sub-par Portable Media Player
Network
- How Video Is Changing the Internet [GigaOM]
- e-Book Echo: Nook Sells Out; Kindle Update Coming [jkOnTheRun]
- Weekend Vid Picks: Twilight Parodies For Bitter Boyfriends [NewTeeVee]
- Earth2Tech Week in Review [Earth2Tech]
- WWD Weekend Reading List [WebWorkerDaily]
- Weekly App Store Picks: November 21, 2009 [TheAppleBlog]
© 2009 The GigaOM Network. Marketing consulting by ACS.


Interactive TV.. Its a dead horse.
Your article is mostly right but there is one issue nearly everyone forgets about.
Interactive TV is mainly a non-standards based systems with no synergy with other advertising platforms. Ie you cannot, for example use your internet advertising components. Do it all again from scratch using very expensive creation tools and people.
Maybe a critical mass may get it some more traction. But in the end, the expensive medium leaves much to be desired and it is best to leave the interactive feature set to the internet where is is cheap and easy to make content and the viewers is in a much better position to interact.
The TV is moving towards the Web browser model where the end user has full control. If this technology does not jell with this idea, its doomed from the start. All interactive TV technology I have looked into is not compatible with this future, and such, is doomed.
Web people appear to have a much better idea then the incumbent TV operaters. Standards use to be used to lock systems up, but these days standards are about letting go of control.
Why do you think Google is considered so powerful and threatening to TV/Cable. Their formula appears to be much more in line with where we are most likely to go.
James
James,
very interesting point you made. And true. Without standards its real hard for a platform to generate momentum.
For IPTV (which in my definition includes interactive TV) there are already steps made for standardization. (distribution technology, middleware, frontend, content development, advertising, etc) So its just a matter of time until this new media will become the “third media”.
I do not think the TV will just become another frontend for the internet. Look at what happened with mobile in countried like Korea, Japan, etc. Mobile is a new media phenomenon and not just another frontend for the classic internet.
I firmly believe that we will see a new media revolution through IPTV including very lucrative new business models which were not possible through the classic PC based web.
Just my 2 cents,
Marco
“The TV is moving towards the Web browser model where the end user has full control. “
I agree. The PC will be the brain; the TV just a peripheral viewing device. PCTVCables.com
What are the “strict government regulations” here is the US?
I suspect the down economy will make it difficult to get many companies to take a chance with this unproven technology. Return on investment baby!
Wow, James, I couldn’t disagree more with you. First, there are standards. It’s taken years to get them in place and the industry to agree to them, but they are now rolling out with momentum. Research tru2way and EBIF for starters. TV advertising is a $70B annual market in the US; internet advertising is $21B as of last year. In addition, consumers are becoming increasingly resistent to web-based advertising, and as click-through rates continue to fall so will revenues. Meanwhile TV has barely begun to take advantage of targeted advertising, response-based advertising, and other forms enabled by interactivity, all of which can increase annual revenues by tens of billions of dollars. Finally, a web browser is a terrible paradigm for television. Remember WebTV? I thought so.