Comments (3)
Linkbacks (7)
-
[...] View post: Open Video Welcomes Video Into the Browser [...]
-
[...] Online video viewing is limited by the fact that browsers don’t natively support it, which forces would-be viewers to download proprietary plug-ins like Flash and Silverlight. Though it’s not like we users are twiddling our thumbs waiting for video support; at this point, nearly all of the world’s online computers have one or more such plug-ins installed See the original post: Open Video Welcomes Video Into the Browser [...]
-
[...] Demo: Facial Detection Within Videos Earlier this week we wrote about the tech side of open video efforts, which are poised to push forward the possibilities for use of video by making it native to web [...]
-
[...] Gannes published an excellent industry overview on open video on Sunday on NewTeeVee. Stephen Shankland at CNET has an overview on the implications of Firefox 3.5 and HTML [...]
-
[...] Video Bay is that it will use open video. For an extended primer on what that means, please see my feature story from last week. On the user side, The Video Bay won’t require Flash (or other plug-ins); you can just view [...]
-
[...] Video Bay is that it will use open video. For an extended primer on what that means, please see my feature story from last week. On the user side, The Video Bay won’t require Flash (or other plug-ins); you can just view video [...]
-
[...] contender. Google, with its Chrome browser, is one of the leaders of the new HTML 5 standard, which handles video natively and could eventually eliminate the need for Flash and Silverlight-type [...]
Leave a Reply
Popular
- BitTorrent After The Pirate Bay: Do You Still Need Trackers?
- Tumblr Marriage Proposal: Behind the Scenes of Justin and Marissa's Engagement
- Get Ready for Flash Player 10.1 to Stream P2P Video to Millions, Swap Files BitTorrent-style
- Ten Sites for Free and Legal Torrents
- The Megawoosh Waterslide Viral: How It Was Really Done
- Six Steps To Get More HD From Your Scientific Atlanta Set-top Box
Recent
- BitTorrent After The Pirate Bay: Do You Still Need Trackers?
- Microsoft and Nielsen Partner for 1 vs. 100 Measurement
- Premium Content Drives Connected Device Adoption
- Site Sponsor: Twistage
- Tumblr Marriage Proposal: Behind the Scenes of Justin and Marissa’s Engagement
- Sungale’s Sub-par Portable Media Player
Network
- Weekend Vid Picks: Twilight Parodies For Bitter Boyfriends [NewTeeVee]
- Skype CEO Outlines Platform Ambitions, Hiring Plans [GigaOM]
- Earth2Tech Week in Review [Earth2Tech]
- WWD Weekend Reading List [WebWorkerDaily]
- WinMo Wrap: Marketplace Hits All WM 6.x Phones; Opera Mobile Advances [jkOnTheRun]
- Weekly App Store Picks: November 21, 2009 [TheAppleBlog]
© 2009 The GigaOM Network. Marketing consulting by ACS.


I was at the conference and was burning to ask the Adobe Flash Player rep, Jennifer Taylor, a simple question: why doesn’t Flash support user-installed codecs?
A publisher could then use whatever codec they wished and instruct their users on how to install the codec.
Why does Adobe support only 2 codecs in the Flash video component? I’m very curious to know if it’s a simple business decision or there is some sort of major technical issue (they seem to have added h.264 easily enough). Again, they don’t need to ship the codecs, just support user-installed codecs (as QuickTime and Windows Media Player do).
Hoping an Adobe rep is reading this…
Great article Liz, thanks for raising the issue. One of the big challenges that Flash (and Silverlight for that matter) face is that if they don’t build enough support into their products, people will just code in HTML 5 and bypass the need for third party plugins. This won’t seem like a big deal to the end user, but if more and more developers start transitioning away from these closed environments, it could have a big impact on how online video ends up evolving.
IMHO, flash using javascript is better as most browsers these days can be enabled to handle javascript. But I also wish that Microsoft could be more industry cooperative, but they probably won’t do so. Well, either way, in the near future, I think Google (and others) will continue to outpace MS with virtualization and open source software apps. What is Silverlight anyway? Proprietary spyware and embedded advertising? No thank you.